Vasily Vasilyevich Rozanov

Russian writer
Also known as: Vasily Vasilyevich Rosanov
Quick Facts
Rozanov also spelled:
Rosanov
Born:
May 2 [April 20, Old Style], 1856, Vetluga, Russian Empire
Died:
Feb. 5, 1919, Sergiyev, Russian S.F.S.R. (aged 62)
Subjects Of Study:
Fyodor Dostoyevsky

Vasily Vasilyevich Rozanov (born May 2 [April 20, Old Style], 1856, Vetluga, Russian Empire—died Feb. 5, 1919, Sergiyev, Russian S.F.S.R.) was a Russian writer, religious thinker, and journalist, best known for the originality and individuality of his prose works.

Rozanov was born into the family of a provincial official of limited means. His parents died before he turned 15. He attended secondary schools in Kostroma, Simbirsk, and Nizhny Novgorod and in 1882 graduated from the University of Moscow. He later taught history and geography in secondary schools in the Russian provinces. In 1893 he moved to St. Petersburg, where he became a government official, but he resigned in 1899 at the urging of A.S. Suvorin, the proprietor of the newspaper Novoye Vremya (“New Time”). Rozanov remained a regular contributor until the newspaper was shut down by the Bolsheviks in October 1917.

His first published work, O ponimanii (1886; “On Understanding”), was a philosophical treatise; it went almost completely unnoticed. From the beginning of the 1890s, Rozanov began publishing widely, mainly in conservative publications, becoming a renowned literary figure within conservative circles. He owed his fame, however, not so much to articles on contemporary topics as to his research in the field of literature (e.g., Legenda o velikom inkvisitore F.M. Dostoyevskogo [1894; Dostoevsky and the Legend of the Grand Inquisitor] and Literaturnye ocherki [1899; “Literary Essays”]). He also wrote articles on Russian schooling, including “Sumerki prosveshcheniya” (1899; “Twilight of Education”), and a book on family life, Semeyny vopros v Rossii, 2 vol. (1903; “The Family Question in Russia”). Out of the latter came one of the subjects he analyzed most deeply—that of sex. His interest in the problems of family life was triggered partly by his personal experiences: he married early but was unable to obtain a divorce, which forced him to marry his second wife in secret; his children from his second marriage were therefore considered “illegitimate.” In his work on family life, Rozanov went beyond the question of society’s and the church’s attitude toward sexuality. He emphasized the sanctity of the sexual act, which he believed was being perverted by certain aspects of human nature and culture. His interest in these matters, as in matters of religion, brought Rozanov close to Russian Symbolism. He was a member and a regular speaker at meetings of St. Petersburg’s Religious-Philosophical Society, and he published in magazines such as Novy Put (“The New Path”), Vesy (“Libra,” or “Scales”), and Zolotoye Runo (“The Golden Fleece”).

From 1912 Rozanov began publishing books consisting of whimsically composed fragments that ranged from a few words to two or three pages; although unusual in Russia for their time, they are reminiscent of the writings of German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche. Uyedinyonnoye (1912; “Solitary Thoughts”; Eng. trans. Solitaria) and Opavshiye listya (1913–15; Fallen Leaves) give the impression of maximum openness and intimacy, and their complexity of meaning arises from contradictory statements. They made him famous as the creator of a new literary genre.

Rozanov was a symbol of contradiction to most Russian readers at the beginning of the 20th century. He was a deeply religious man throughout his life, but he also fought with the church; his interest in Jews and Judaism sometimes turned to anti-Semitism; and his political conservatism coexisted with his sharp criticism of autocracy. He also contributed to publications of markedly different political convictions.

After the Bolsheviks shut down Suvorin’s Novoye Vremya, Rozanov and his family moved to Sergiyev, near the Trinity-St. Sergius monastery, one of the main holy centres of the Russian Orthodox Church. He published Apokalipsis nashego vremeni (1917–18; “The Apocalypse of Our Time”), which did not bring him a profit. He had no regular income, and he died in poverty. Many of his works remained in manuscript and were first published in the 1990s.

This article was most recently revised and updated by Encyclopaedia Britannica.
Britannica Chatbot logo

Britannica Chatbot

Chatbot answers are created from Britannica articles using AI. This is a beta feature. AI answers may contain errors. Please verify important information using Britannica articles. About Britannica AI.
Related Topics:
philosophy

nihilism, (from Latin nihil, “nothing”), originally a philosophy of moral and epistemological skepticism that arose in 19th-century Russia during the early years of the reign of Tsar Alexander II. The term was famously used by Friedrich Nietzsche to describe the disintegration of traditional morality in Western society. In the 20th century, nihilism encompassed a variety of philosophical and aesthetic stances that, in one sense or another, denied the existence of genuine moral truths or values, rejected the possibility of knowledge or communication, and asserted the ultimate meaninglessness or purposelessness of life or of the universe.

The term is an old one, applied to certain heretics in the Middle Ages. In Russian literature, nihilism was probably first used by N.I. Nadezhdin, in an 1829 article in the Messenger of Europe, in which he applied it to Aleksandr Pushkin. Nadezhdin, as did V.V. Bervi in 1858, equated nihilism with skepticism. Mikhail Nikiforovich Katkov, a well-known conservative journalist who interpreted nihilism as synonymous with revolution, presented it as a social menace because of its negation of all moral principles.

It was Ivan Turgenev, in his celebrated novel Fathers and Sons (1862), who popularized the term through the figure of Bazarov the nihilist. Eventually, the nihilists of the 1860s and ’70s came to be regarded as disheveled, untidy, unruly, ragged men who rebelled against tradition and social order. The philosophy of nihilism then began to be associated erroneously with the regicide of Alexander II (1881) and the political terror that was employed by those active at the time in clandestine organizations opposed to absolutism.

If to the conservative elements the nihilists were the curse of the time, to the liberals such as N.G. Chernyshevsky they represented a mere transitory factor in the development of national thought—a stage in the struggle for individual freedom—and a true spirit of the rebellious young generation. In his novel What Is to Be Done? (1863), Chernyshevsky endeavoured to detect positive aspects in the nihilist philosophy. Similarly, in his Memoirs, Prince Peter Kropotkin, the leading Russian anarchist, defined nihilism as the symbol of struggle against all forms of tyranny, hypocrisy, and artificiality and for individual freedom.

Fundamentally, 19th-century nihilism represented a philosophy of negation of all forms of aestheticism; it advocated utilitarianism and scientific rationalism. Classical philosophical systems were rejected entirely. Nihilism represented a crude form of positivism and materialism, a revolt against the established social order; it negated all authority exercised by the state, by the church, or by the family. It based its belief on nothing but scientific truth; science would be the solution of all social problems. All evils, nihilists believed, derived from a single source—ignorance—which science alone would overcome.

The thinking of 19th-century nihilists was profoundly influenced by philosophers, scientists, and historians such as Ludwig Feuerbach, Charles Darwin, Henry Buckle, and Herbert Spencer. Since nihilists denied the duality of human beings as a combination of body and soul, of spiritual and material substance, they came into violent conflict with ecclesiastical authorities. Since nihilists questioned the doctrine of the divine right of kings, they came into similar conflict with secular authorities. Since they scorned all social bonds and family authority, the conflict between parents and children became equally immanent, and it is this theme that is best reflected in Turgenev’s novel.

This article was most recently revised and updated by Adam Augustyn.