Gawin Douglas (born 1475?—died September 1522, London) was a Scottish poet and the first British translator of the Aeneid. As a bishop and a member of a powerful family, he also played an important part in a troubled period in Scottish history.
Four surviving works attributed to Douglas reflect his moral earnestness and his command of difficult metrical forms: a long poem, Conscience; two moral allegories, The Palice of Honour and King Hart; and the Aeneid. The Palice of Honour (1501), a dream allegory on the theme “where does true honour lie,” extols a sterner rhetorical virtue than the young poet was to exemplify in his own subsequent career. King Hart (uncertainly ascribed to Douglas) describes vigorously and graphically the progress of Hart (the human soul) from a youthful enslavement to pleasure through the inevitable assaults of conscience, age, and death. Douglas’s last literary work was the first direct translation of the whole Aeneid to be made in Britain.
After the Battle of Flodden (1513), in which James IV of Scotland was killed, creating a struggle for power between rival Scottish factions, Douglas abandoned his literary career for political activities. The marriage of the king’s widow, Margaret Tudor, sister of Henry VIII, to Douglas’s nephew invested the Douglas family with an almost royal dignity and aligned them with the pro-English faction in Scotland. Douglas became bishop of Dunkeld and the queen’s chief adviser and involved himself in a series of intrigues to advance her cause and the power of his family, which led ultimately to his downfall. In 1521 he was forced by political enemies to flee to England, where he remained in exile until his death in London from the plague. In his last years he found comfort in his friendship with an Italian humanist, Polidoro Vergilio.
Though his work stands on the threshold of Renaissance humanism, Douglas’s heritage as a poet and translator is medieval. In his rendering of the Aeneid he shows a scholarly concern with the technique of translation and sensitivity to linguistic differences, but he is medieval in the casual way he brings his original up to date, and in the absence of “classical” diction and gravity of tone. Each book has an original prologue that is a notable piece of writing.