Whether college athletes should be paid is widely debated. Some argue the NCAA, colleges, and universities profit unfairly and exorbitantly from the work and likenesses of college athletes, who are risking their bodies as well as their future careers and earning potential while often living below the poverty line. Others argue that the scholarships given to student athletes are fair compensation for their services, especially since so few college athletes actually "go pro," and that the real problem is not greater compensation for student-athletes but an incompetent amateur sports system for feeding talent to professional sports leagues. For more on the debate over paying college athletes, visit ProCon.org.
Should colleges pay college athletes?
Should college student loan debt be eliminated via forgiveness or bankruptcy?
Whether college student loan debt should be eliminated via forgiveness or bankruptcy is widely debated. Some argue forgiveness would boost the economy, help rectify racial inequity, and foster a healthier citizenry, while denying student loan debtors the benefits of bankruptcy--benefits that other debtors have access to--is unfair. Others argue that people must be held responsible for their personal economic choices, that forgiveness would disproportionately help more financially secure college graduates and would only be a temporary bandage for the much larger problem of inflated college costs, while bankruptcy would allow borrowers to abuse the loan system and encourage colleges to increase tuition. For more on the student loan debt debate, visit ProCon.org.