Also called:
H-D method or H-D
Key People:
Clark L. Hull

hypothetico-deductive method, procedure for the construction of a scientific theory that will account for results obtained through direct observation and experimentation and that will, through inference, predict further effects that can then be verified or disproved by empirical evidence derived from other experiments.

An early version of the hypothetico-deductive method was proposed by the Dutch physicist Christiaan Huygens (1629–95). The method generally assumes that properly formed theories are conjectures intended to explain a set of observable data. These hypotheses, however, cannot be conclusively established until the consequences that logically follow from them are verified through additional observations and experiments. The method treats theory as a deductive system in which particular empirical phenomena are explained by relating them back to general principles and definitions. However, it rejects the claim of Cartesian mechanics that those principles and definitions are self-evident and valid; it assumes that their validity is determined only by the exact light their consequences throw on previously unexplained phenomena or on actual scientific problems.

The Editors of Encyclopaedia BritannicaThis article was most recently revised and updated by Adam Augustyn.
Key People:
Karl Popper

criterion of falsifiability, in the philosophy of science, a standard of evaluation of putatively scientific theories, according to which a theory is genuinely scientific only if it is possible in principle to establish that it is false. The British philosopher Sir Karl Popper (1902–94) proposed the criterion as a foundational method of the empirical sciences. He held that genuinely scientific theories are never finally confirmed, because disconfirming observations (observations that are inconsistent with the empirical predictions of the theory) are always possible no matter how many confirming observations have been made. Scientific theories are instead incrementally corroborated through the absence of disconfirming evidence in a number of well-designed experiments. According to Popper, some disciplines that have claimed scientific validity—e.g., astrology, metaphysics, Marxism, and psychoanalysis —are not empirical sciences, because their subject matter cannot be falsified in this manner.

This article was most recently revised and updated by Matt Stefon.