To access extended pro and con arguments, sources, and discussion questions about whether Social Security should be privatized, go to ProCon.org.
Social Security accounted for 23% ($1 trillion) of total US federal spending in 2019. Since 2010, the Social Security trust fund has been paying out more in benefits than it collects in employee taxes, and is projected to run out of money by 2035. One proposal to replace the current government-administered system is the partial privatization of Social Security, which would allow workers to manage their own retirement funds through personal investment accounts.
President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed the Social Security Act on Aug. 14, 1935, creating the Social Security program. The program provided a social insurance system based on the idea that if workers pooled a portion of their wages, they would be able to protect each other and their families against wage loss due to retirement. Through this national benefits program, Social Security made available a basic level of monthly income to workers who paid into the system.
Social Security does not maintain individual savings accounts for each worker, but operates as a pay-as-you-go system in which each generation of workers supports the preceding generation’s retirees. In 2015, US citizens had 6.2% of their earnings (up to $118,500) taken out as Social Security Federal Insurance Contribution Act (FICA) taxes, which are commonly referred to as payroll taxes. Employers paid 6.2% of each employee’s earnings (up to $118,500) in payroll taxes. Individuals can begin collecting reduced retirement benefits at age 62, and full retirement benefits can be claimed at the age of 67.
Although the Social Security Act entitles workers to receive benefits, these benefits are not guaranteed by law. The federal government does not have a legal liability to pay retirees the money they paid into the system over their working careers and Congress can change the rules regarding benefit eligibility at any time.
About 65 million people were receiving Social Security benefits at the end of 2020: 46 million retired workers and 3 million of their dependents; 8.2 million disabled workers and 1.5 million of their dependents; and six million surviving relatives of deceased workers. As of Mar. 10, 2021, the withholding rate for social security was 6.2% for the employer and 6.2% for the employee.
According to the 2015 annual report of the Social Security Board of Trustees, the cost of Social Security benefits would exceed tax revenues beginning in 2020, and the program would become insolvent (i.e. unable to pay beneficiaries in full) when reserves become exhausted in 2034. Social Security was projected to have enough tax revenue to pay 79% of benefits owed in 2034. The Trustees predicted a budget shortfall of $10.7 trillion through 2089. The 2020 Social Security Board of Trustees report indicated that, if no further action is taken, the program will be insolvent by 2035 when the US governments will be able to pay about three quarters of benefits.
PRO
- The current Social Security program will become insolvent by 2035, so a better system is urgently required.
- With private personal accounts, retirees can see higher returns on their investment and more money in their pockets.
- Private accounts give individuals control over their retirement decisions.
- Being able to invest in one’s own private retirement account removes the uncertainty that accompanies the current government-controlled program.
- Private retirement accounts give workers the contractual right to retirement benefits, a right missing from the current Social Security system.
CON
- Privatizing Social Security would do nothing to solve its impending insolvency, and could actually make it worse.
- Private Social Security accounts will undermine the guaranteed retirement income provided by Social Security by putting peoples’ retirement money at the whim of the stock market.
- Privatizing Social Security would dramatically increase the national debt.
- Privatizing Social Security will put billions of dollars into the pockets of Wall Street financial services corporations in the form of brokerage and management fees.
- Other policy changes can fix Social Security more effectively and less disruptively than privatization.
- Many people lack the basic financial literacy to make wise investment decisions on their own, and if workers had to adopt private accounts, unscrupulous financial advisors could take advantage of novice investors.
This article was published on May 27, 2021, at Britannica’s ProCon.org, a nonpartisan issue-information source.