false flag, harmful, often militant, event or action that is designed to appear as though perpetrated by someone other than the person or group responsible for it. False flag operations are often calculated to generate sympathy for the attacked group. The term is sometimes used to describe a deliberate misrepresentation of one’s motives, although this sense is less frequent in contemporary usage.

Because false flag operations are usually covert, the concept of false flag has often been co-opted by conspiracy theorists to explain away tragedies that challenge their values or worldview. The storming of the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021, for example, was purported by one conspiracy theory to have been led by antifa, a loose association of left-wing activists, to undermine efforts by Donald Trump’s supporters to challenge the results of the U.S. presidential election of 2020. Such claims are usually based on mere suspicion rather than actual evidence, although adherents to those claims often cling uncritically to details, factual or nonfactual, that affirm their expectations (see confirmation bias).

The earliest known uses of the term false flag referred figuratively to a friendly flag flown by enemy ships in order to get within striking distance. The term first appears in a 16th-century anti-Roman Catholic polemic that claims Catholics pretend to faith while engaging in irreligious activities. Texts over the next few centuries show that the term continued to be used in a religious sense until the 1800s, when it started appearing in a literal sense to refer to deception at sea.

One notable example in modern warfare took place at the outbreak of World War I, when the German cruiser SMS Cap Trafalgar disguised itself as the British HMS Carmania and subsequently attacked the actual HMS Carmania off the coast of Brazil. On September 18, 1931, Japanese troops executed a likely false flag attack near Mukden (now Shenyang, Liaoning province, China). A small explosion on the Japanese-controlled South Manchurian Railway was used as the pretext for a Japanese attack on the Chinese garrison in Mukden and eventually the invasion of all of Manchuria. There were many instances of false flag operations during World War II, such as the raid on Saint-Nazaire, in German-occupied France, by British commandos, who disguised an explosive-laden vessel as a German warship to get within a short distance of an important German-occupied harbour before detonating the masquerading ship. In land warfare, the perhaps most infamous false flag occurred in August 1939, when Nazi operatives disguised themselves as Polish soldiers and attacked a German outpost in Gleiwitz (now Gliwice, Poland), which Adolf Hitler used as a pretext for the invasion of Poland.

During the Cold War, the United States considered staging several attacks (under the code name Operation Northwoods) in 1962 around southern Florida to look like acts of Cuban aggression. The goal was to give the United States a pretext to invade Cuba.

Suspicions of false flag operations are common in the 21st century. Among the most notable examples took place during the Russian invasion and annexation of the Crimea region in Ukraine in 2014, where Russian operatives were disguised as local separatists. This tactic was repeated in the Donbas region of Ukraine later in 2014. The falsification of reports of attacks on Russian speakers was also used to justify a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.

Roland Martin
Top Questions

What is propaganda?

When was propaganda first used?

Where is propaganda used?

Who was the minister of propaganda for Hitler?

News

Propaganda reveals infrastructure threat Apr. 6, 2025, 2:04 AM ET (Taipei Times)

propaganda, dissemination of information—facts, arguments, rumours, half-truths, or lies—to influence public opinion. It is often conveyed through mass media.

Propaganda is the more or less systematic effort to manipulate other people’s beliefs, attitudes, or actions by means of symbols (words, gestures, banners, monuments, music, clothing, insignia, hairstyles, designs on coins and postage stamps, and so forth). Deliberateness and a relatively heavy emphasis on manipulation distinguish propaganda from casual conversation or the free and easy exchange of ideas. Propagandists have a specified goal or set of goals. To achieve these, they deliberately select facts, arguments, and displays of symbols and present them in ways they think will have the most effect. To maximize effect, they may omit or distort pertinent facts or simply lie, and they may try to divert the attention of the reactors (the people they are trying to sway) from everything but their own propaganda.

Comparatively deliberate selectivity and manipulation also distinguish propaganda from education. Educators try to present various sides of an issue—the grounds for doubting as well as the grounds for believing the statements they make, and the disadvantages as well as the advantages of every conceivable course of action. Education aims to induce reactors to collect and evaluate evidence for themselves and assists them in learning the techniques for doing so. It must be noted, however, that some propagandists may look upon themselves as educators and may believe that they are uttering the purest truth, that they are emphasizing or distorting certain aspects of the truth only to make a valid message more persuasive, or that the courses of action that they recommend are in fact the best actions that the reactor could take. By the same token, the reactor who regards the propagandist’s message as self-evident truth may think of it as educational; this often seems to be the case with “true believers”—dogmatic reactors to dogmatic religious, social, or political propaganda. “Education” for one person may be “propaganda” for another.

Propaganda and related concepts

Connotations of the term propaganda

The word propaganda itself, as used in recent centuries, apparently derives from the title and work of the Congregatio de Propaganda Fide (Congregation for Propagation of the Faith), an organization of Roman Catholic cardinals founded in 1622 to carry on missionary work. To many Roman Catholics the word may therefore have, at least in missionary or ecclesiastical terms, a highly respectable connotation. But even to these persons, and certainly to many others, the term is often a pejorative one tending to connote such things as the discredited atrocity stories and deceptively stated war aims of World Wars I and II, the operations of the Nazis’ Ministry of Public Enlightenment and Propaganda, and the broken campaign promises of a thousand politicians. Also, it is reminiscent of countless instances of false and misleading advertising (especially in countries using Latin languages, in which propagande commerciale or some equivalent is a common term for commercial advertising).

To informed students of the history of communism, the term propaganda has yet another connotation, associated with the term agitation. The two terms were first used by the Russian theorist of Marxism Georgy Plekhanov and later elaborated upon by Vladimir Ilich Lenin in a pamphlet What Is to Be Done? (1902), in which he defined “propaganda” as the reasoned use of historical and scientific arguments to indoctrinate the educated and enlightened (the attentive and informed publics, in the language of today’s social sciences); he defined “agitation” as the use of slogans, parables, and half-truths to exploit the grievances of the uneducated and the unreasonable. Since he regarded both strategies as absolutely essential to political victory, he combined them in the term agitprop. Every unit of historical communist parties had an agitprop section, and to the communist the use of propaganda in Lenin’s sense was commendable and honest. Thus, a standard Soviet manual for teachers of social sciences was entitled Propagandistu politekonomii (For the Propagandist of Political Economy), and a pocket-sized booklet issued weekly to suggest timely slogans and brief arguments to be used in speeches and conversations among the masses was called Bloknot agitatora (The Agitator’s Notebook).

Related terms

Related to the general sense of propaganda is the concept of “propaganda of the deed.” This denotes taking nonsymbolic action (such as economic or coercive action), not for its direct effects but for its possible propagandistic effects. Examples of propaganda of the deed would include staging an atomic “test” or the public torture of a criminal for its presumable deterrent effect on others, or giving foreign “economic aid” primarily to influence the recipient’s opinions or actions and without much intention of building up the recipient’s economy.

Distinctions are sometimes made between overt propaganda, in which the propagandists and perhaps their backers are made known to the reactors, and covert propaganda, in which the sources are secret or disguised. Covert propaganda might include such things as political advertisements that are unsigned or signed with false names, clandestine radio stations using false names, and statements by editors, politicians, or others who have been secretly bribed by governments, political backers, or business firms. Sophisticated diplomatic negotiation, legal argument, collective bargaining, commercial advertising, and political campaigns are of course quite likely to include considerable amounts of both overt and covert propaganda, accompanied by propaganda of the deed.

Are you a student?
Get a special academic rate on Britannica Premium.

Another term related to propaganda is psychological warfare (sometimes abbreviated to psychwar), which is the prewar or wartime use of propaganda directed primarily at confusing or demoralizing enemy populations or troops, putting them off guard in the face of coming attacks, or inducing them to surrender. The related concept of political warfare encompasses the use of propaganda, among many other techniques, during peacetime to intensify social and political divisions and to sow confusion within the societies of adversary states.

Still another related concept is that of brainwashing. The term usually means intensive political indoctrination. It may involve long political lectures or discussions, long compulsory reading assignments, and so forth, sometimes in conjunction with efforts to reduce the reactor’s resistance by exhausting him either physically through torture, overwork, or denial of sleep or psychologically through solitary confinement, threats, emotionally disturbing confrontations with interrogators or defected comrades, humiliation in front of fellow citizens, and the like. The term brainwashing was widely used in sensational journalism to refer to such activities (and to many other activities) as they were allegedly conducted by Maoists in China and elsewhere.

Another related word, advertising, has mainly commercial connotations, though it need not be restricted to this; political candidates, party programs, and positions on political issues may be “packaged” and “marketed” by advertising firms. The words promotion and public relations have wider, vaguer connotations and are often used to avoid the implications of “advertising” or “propaganda.” “Publicity” and “publicism” often imply merely making a subject known to a public, without educational, propagandistic, or commercial intent.