paramilitary
- Key People:
- Željko Ražnatović
- Yahya Sinwar
- Related Topics:
- armed force
paramilitary, group or organization that operates outside a country’s formal military structure. Paramilitaries are typically modeled after military organizations and may have similar training and equipment. These groups often have political or ideological aims and may be involved in activities such as counterinsurgency, anti-terrorism, or internal security. They are often associated with governments but can also be used by non-state actors such as extremist groups or criminal organizations. Paramilitary organizations can be found in many countries, and their role and actions vary depending on their context. Some examples include the Border Security Force in India, the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC), and the Constellis (formerly Blackwater) private security firm.
The history of paramilitaries can in some sense be traced back to ancient civilizations, wherein irregular troops were used in warfare to supplement regular armies. However, the modern concept of paramilitaries as a distinct type of organization began to take shape in the 19th century, when various groups and organizations began to form outside of countries’ formal military structures. The United States, for example, saw the rise of the Pinkerton National Detective Agency, an organization that hunted federal criminals for the U.S. government and engaged in strikebreaking for large businesses. At its peak, Pinkerton could rightly claim to be larger than the United States’ standing army. The company eventually shrunk due to public backlash at its methods and the simultaneous evolution of U.S. law enforcement.
Paramilitaries in the 20th century
In the 1920s and ’30s, paramilitaries were often associated with fascist and extremist political movements, such as Italy’s Blackshirts and Ireland’s Blueshirts. The Schutzstaffel (SS) was arguably the most powerful (and inhumane) of these groups. Begun as a small unit of volunteers to provide security for Nazi meetings, the SS grew into one of Nazi Germany’s most powerful organizations, terrorizing the country’s own citizens and those of its occupied territories until the government’s defeat in 1945. No other apparatus of the Nazi regime was more responsible for the murder of an estimated six million Jews during the Holocaust.
In the post-World War II period, many countries in Latin America, Africa, and Asia saw the rise of similar paramilitary groups that were used by governments to suppress political opposition and to maintain control over populations. In some cases, they were used to fight against separatist movements; the Belgian Congo crisis, the Vietnam War, and the Rhodesian Bush War all involved paramilitary forces. In other cases, these groups were used to fight against communist or leftist forces. Under the auspices of the so-called Reagan Doctrine, the United States made conspicuous use of paramilitaries for this purpose in the 1980s.
Paramilitaries were involved in multiple genocides during the 1990s. Between April and July 1994, the Interahamwe and Impuzamugambi militias in Rwanda participated in the killing of more than 800,000 Tutsi, Twa, and moderate Hutu. During the breakup of Yugoslavia and the Bosnian War (1992–95), Serbian paramilitary forces participated in ethnic cleansing alongside Serbian and Bosnian Serb armies. In Colombia, the paramilitary United Self-Defense Forces of Colombia (AUC) massacred civilians in the villages of La Granja (1996) and El Aro (1997).
The growth of private paramilitaries
During the 21st century, paramilitaries have often been associated with non-state actors such as criminal organizations and extremist groups, especially in countries where governments cannot effectively control the lands within their borders. These organizations are often involved in activities such as drug trafficking, extortion, and human smuggling. Examples include the Islamic militant organization al-Qaeda and the Los Zetas criminal syndicate in Mexico. However, paramilitaries have legally flourished within more powerful states as well. South Africa, Great Britain, and the United States are all home to well-known private military companies (PMCs) that are paid to perform security operations in combat zones, both by their governments and by private entities. In China, private security companies became a massive growth industry after they were legalized in 2009; use of these groups is tightly controlled by the Chinese Communist Party.
The Wagner Group, perhaps the most prominent PMC, effectively functioned as an instrument of the Russian state in the Syrian Civil War and the Russia-Ukraine War. Whereas many mercenary groups have tended to draw on those with military experience to fill their ranks, Wagner recruited inmates from Russian prisons. Tensions between Wagner leader Yevgeny Prigozhin and the uniformed Russian military exploded in spectacular fashion in June 2023, when Prigozhin “declared war” on the Russian defense ministry and led an armored column on a drive toward Moscow. Although the conventional Russian military appeared to be wholly unable to check the advance of the Wagner force, Prigozhin called a halt to the mutiny when his army was just 120 miles (roughly 200 km) from the Kremlin. Russian Pres. Vladimir Putin condemned Prigozhin as a traitor but praised Wagner’s fighters as heroes—this despite the fact that they had killed dozens of Russian troops during their rebellion. In August 2023 Prigozhin was killed along with nine others (including some of his top Wagner lieutenants) when his private plane crashed in suspicious circumstances halfway between Moscow and St. Petersburg. In the wake of Prigozhin’s death, the Kremlin asserted a much more direct role in the control of what remained of the Wagner Group.
The use of private military companies is controversial. Their employment is seen by many human rights organizations as a method of off-loading responsibility for human rights violations—a fear that has in some cases been borne out, as employees of PMCs have been found guilty of abuses on multiple occasions. The United Nations Working Group on the Use of Mercenaries has repeatedly reported on the threat to human rights that PMCs pose, but many countries, including the United States, have refused to vote in favor of their removal. With paramilitaries making up a significant portion of manpower even among world powers, it is likely that they will continue to play significant roles in military operations for some time to come.