super political action committee
Learn about this topic in these articles:
Assorted References
- history of political action committees
- In political action committee
…the campaigns of other candidates; Super PACs, which were established in 2010 following the U.S. Supreme Court’s Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission decision (and the subsequent SpeechNow.org v. Federal Election Commission ruling) and which allow both corporations and unions to make independent expenditures from their general treasuries; and nonconnected…
Read More
- In political action committee
- Tea Party movement
- In Tea Party movement: The 2012 election and the government shutdown of 2013
…groups immediately criticized Rove—whose other super PACs had spent $175 million in the 2012 election cycle to little effect—for attempting to thwart what they considered to be the wishes of the conservative base. As the divide between the Republican establishment and the Tea Party threatened to become an irreparable breach,…
Read More
impact on presidential elections
- In presidency of the United States of America: The money game
…to the growth of so-called Super PACs, organizations allowed to raise unlimited amounts of money to support or defeat a candidate or an issue, so long as these expenditures are made independently from the official campaigns. Between the 2008 and 2012 presidential elections, the amounts spent by such independent groups…
Read More
- 2012 presidential election
- In Barack Obama: The 2012 election
…of millions spent by “super PACs,” the political action committees that—as a result of the Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission—were allowed to accept unlimited donations from wealthy individuals, corporations, and unions, provided that the PACs operated independently of the candidate’s campaign.
Read More