table of opposites

philosophy
verifiedCite
While every effort has been made to follow citation style rules, there may be some discrepancies. Please refer to the appropriate style manual or other sources if you have any questions.
Select Citation Style
Feedback
Corrections? Updates? Omissions? Let us know if you have suggestions to improve this article (requires login).
Thank you for your feedback

Our editors will review what you’ve submitted and determine whether to revise the article.

Key People:
Aristotle
Related Topics:
Pythagoreanism

table of opposites, in Pythagorean philosophy, a set of 10 pairs of contrary qualities. The earliest reference is in Aristotle, who said that it was in use among some contemporary Pythagoreans. But Aristotle provided no real information about its function in Pythagorean practice or theory or about its origin. Some scholars have detected possible archaic elements in it, but others have suggested that its originator was in fact Speusippus, Plato’s nephew. Because no statements of Pythagoras have survived, and because Aristotle customarily accommodated pre-Socratic philosophy to his own terminology and problems, the problem is difficult to resolve.

Aristotle’s table of the Pythagorean opposites is as follows:

LimitedUnlimited
OddEven
UnityPlurality
RightLeft
MaleFemale
At RestIn Motion
StraightCurved
LightDarkness
GoodEvil
SquareOblong

Aristotle remarked that Alcmaeon of Croton, a medical writer, also had pairs of contraries as the first “principles” of things and also of most human things, but he did not know whether contemporary Pythagoreans influenced Alcmaeon in this regard or vice versa.

Aristotle associated moral prestige with the left-hand column, because the “good” things appear in that column. The table had some currency among Aristotle’s contemporaries, perhaps in the Academy (Plato’s school in Athens), but his references are made merely in the interest of supporting certain views of his own.

Aristotle’s formal table has 10 members, because the Pythagoreans considered 10 the perfect number. But the pairs varied in different authors. Possibly no list or set number of opposites became canonical among the Pythagoreans.