actor-manager system

theatrical production
verifiedCite
While every effort has been made to follow citation style rules, there may be some discrepancies. Please refer to the appropriate style manual or other sources if you have any questions.
Select Citation Style
Feedback
Corrections? Updates? Omissions? Let us know if you have suggestions to improve this article (requires login).
Thank you for your feedback

Our editors will review what you’ve submitted and determine whether to revise the article.

External Websites

actor-manager system, method of theatrical production dominant in England and the U.S. in the 19th century, consisting of a permanent company formed by a leading actor who chose his or her own plays, took a leading role in them, and handled business and financial arrangements.

The advantages of this system became apparent in the 18th century when successful actor-managers such as Colley Cibber and David Garrick achieved performance standards superior to those achieved by theatre owners who hired occasional casts for individual plays. In the 19th century great actor-managers such as William Charles Macready, Sir Henry Irving, Madame Vestris, Sir Herbert Beerbohm Tree, and Laura Keene maintained high standards. The repertoire usually involved a combination of Shakespeare, popular melodramas, and new dramas or comedies. The era of the actor-manager was geared to star performances, and often the actor’s most famous performance was in an inferior literary work, such as Irving’s role in the horror play The Bells. Several factors contributed to the decline of the actor-manager system: more corporate ownership of theatres, a trend toward ensemble-style acting, obsolescence of the stock system of play rotation in favour of long runs, and the cost of investing in new plays, which led to new combinations of artistic personnel for each new venture.

This article was most recently revised and updated by Chelsey Parrott-Sheffer.