Sanctuary Cities
Although there is no official legal definition of sanctuary city, the term generally refers to towns, cities, or counties that decline to cooperate completely with federal detention requests related to undocumented immigrants, often with a “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy. [2]
Some argue that sanctuary cities, such as San Francisco, New York City, and Chicago, should not receive federal funding, because they are not enforcing federal immigration laws. Others say that sanctuary city policies protect both citizens and undocumented immigrants.
As of Mar. 22, 2021, there were 11 states, 40 cities, and 143 counties listed as sanctuary jurisdictions by the Center for Immigration Studies. [32]
Florida banned sanctuary cities on June 14, 2019, joining at least 11 other states with similar rules, according to CNN. Representatives in other states have since pushed for sanctuary city bans, including New Hampshire, Georgia, and Oklahoma. [22][24][25] [26]
Sanctuary cities grew from the Sanctuary Movement of the late 1980s and early 1990s, in which religious congregations began helping undocumented Salvadorian and Guatemalan families settle in the United States. The congregations acted in direct defiance of U.S. immigration authorities, who denied over 90% of asylum requests by immigrants fleeing violence in El Salvador and Guatemala. The sanctuary activists believed that the federal government was breaking international and domestic refugee laws. [1][2]
Los Angeles was the first city to enact sanctuary policies, focusing on undocumented immigrants already in the United States. The chief of police enacted Special Order No. 40 on Nov. 27, 1979, stating that police officers should not inquire about immigration status and should provide city services to everyone equally. San Francisco followed suit, passing the “City of Refuge” resolution in 1985 and “City of Refuge” ordinance in 1989, which required that all city employees stop immigration policing and provide city services to all residents regardless of immigration status. [2][12][29]
The Donald Trump administration held that the federal government should be able to withhold funds from sanctuary cities for their noncompliance with federal laws. The Joe Biden administration reversed that policy. [22][27][28][30][31]
(This article first appeared on ProCon.org and was last updated on August 9, 2022.)
| PROS | CONS |
|---|---|
| Pro 1: Sanctuary cities encourage better relationships between undocumented immigrants and law enforcement. Read More. | Con 1: Sanctuary cities harbor criminals, creating a dangerous environment for U.S. citizens. Read More. |
| Pro 2: Sanctuary policies are legal, being protected by the Tenth Amendment. Read More. | Con 2: Sanctuary policies defy federal laws to which state and local governments are bound. Read More. |
| Pro 3: Sanctuary cities protect undocumented immigrants against federal immigration laws. Read More. | Con 3: Sanctuary policies prevent local and state police officers from doing their jobs. Read More. |
Pro Arguments
(Go to Con Arguments)Pro 1: Sanctuary cities encourage better relationships between undocumented immigrants and law enforcement.
Josh Harkinson of Mother Jones says that undocumented immigrant cooperation with the police is statistically proven to make sanctuary cities safer. [15]
Murder rates in San Francisco, one of the oldest sanctuary cities, were at their lowest in 2014 (with 45 murders) since the 1989 “City of Refuge” ordinance was enacted. [15]
San Francisco’s murder rate is lower than comparable non-sanctuary cities, with 5.75 murders per 100,000 residents in 2013 compared with 11.39 in Dallas and 15.17 in Indianapolis. [15]
Some 70% of undocumented immigrants are less likely to report being the victim of a crime, and 45% of Latinos are less likely to report crimes or voluntarily offer information about a crime for fear that police officers will ask about their immigration status. The fear of being asked about immigration status also makes people less likely to cooperate with investigations. [15][16][19]
Pro 2: Sanctuary policies are legal, being protected by the Tenth Amendment.
The Tenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides for the separation of federal and state powers.
According to the Immigrant Legal Resource Center, the amendment prevents the “federal government from coercing state or local governments to use their resources to enforce a federal regulatory program, like immigration,” and, thus, Congress cannot compel state or local governments to collect immigration status information in order to share it with the federal government. [4][7]
Because the data are never collected because of “don’t ask, don’t tell” policies, the local and state governments are not in violation of federal law. [4]
Pro 3: Sanctuary cities protect undocumented immigrants against federal immigration laws.
Many people believe that the federal immigration deportation policies are unjust, because they target undocumented immigrants indiscriminately, deport people who have lived in the United States since childhood, deport people who have committed no crimes, separate families, and cause people to live in constant fear of deportation and its devastating consequences. [11]
Libby Schaaf, mayor of Oakland, California, said, “I like to compare this to conscientious objector status. We are not going to use our resources to enforce what we believe are unjust immigration laws.” [11]
Con Arguments
(Go to Pro Arguments)Con 1: Sanctuary cities harbor criminals, creating a dangerous environment for U.S. citizens.
Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez, an undocumented immigrant, had seven felony convictions in the United States and had been deported from the country five times. Yet, the city of San Francisco declined to detain him for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials and released him into the community. In July 2015 Lopez-Sanchez was charged with murdering Katie Steinle in San Francisco. [8][9]
Of 8,145 undocumented immigrants released from detention requests between Jan. 1, 2014, and Aug. 31, 2014, 5,132 (63%) had previous criminal convictions or were marked a public safety concern; 2,984 (36.6%) had felony charges or convictions; 1,909 (23.4%) had misdemeanor convictions or charges related to violence, assault, sexual abuse, weapons, or drug distribution; and 239 (2.9%) had three or more misdemeanor convictions. [18]
Con 2: Sanctuary policies defy federal laws to which state and local governments are bound.
U.S. Code, Title 8, § 1373, states that “a Federal, State, or local government entity or official may not prohibit, or in any way restrict, any government entity or official from sending to, or receiving from, the Immigration and Naturalization Service information regarding the citizenship or immigration status, lawful or unlawful, of any individual.” [5]
The U.S. Department of Justice requires that most recipients of federal grant money certify their compliance with all federal laws. Sanctuary cities, by not asking about, recording, and submitting to the federal government the immigration status of residents, are violating federal law and the rules for getting federal grant money. [4][6]
Con 3: Sanctuary policies prevent local and state police officers from doing their jobs.
Sanctuary policies prevent the police from investigating, questioning, and arresting people who have broken federal immigration law. Many crimes, violent and otherwise, could be prevented if local law enforcement in sanctuary cities could arrest undocumented immigrants for their first crime on U.S. soil—illegal entry into the country—and turn them over to federal law enforcement. [14]
According to Heather Mac Donald, Thomas W. Smith Fellow at the Manhattan Institute, many Salvadorian gang members living in Los Angeles entered the United States illegally, but, because of sanctuary policies, LA police officers cannot arrest the undocumented immigrants for illegal entry. Instead, law enforcement has to wait for a second crime to be committed to get the criminals off the street. [14]
Discussion Questions
- How would you summarize the reasons why cities or states might decline to cooperate with the federal government on detention requests? What other solutions can you think of to address their concerns?
- Should the federal government be allowed to withhold funding for any reasons it decides? Why or why not?
- Which side do you find most compelling? List three specific pieces of supporting evidence from the article (or from additional research) that support your view.
Take Action
- Consider the argument that sanctuary cities do not suffer increased crime, according to Daniel E. Martínez and Ricardo D. Martínez-Schuldt.
- Explore the topic of sanctuary cities at Learning for Justice.
- Analyze Hans von Spakovsky’s argument that sanctuary cities make U.S. citizens less safe.
- Consider how you felt about the issue before reading this article. After reading the pros and cons on this topic, has your thinking changed? If so, how? List two to three ways. If your thoughts have not changed, list two to three ways your better understanding of the other side of the issue now helps you better argue your position.
- Push for the position and policies you support by writing U.S.senators and representatives.
Sources
- Peter Mancina, “In the Spirit of Sanctuary: Sanctuary-City Policy Advocacy and the Production of Sanctuary-Power in San Francisco, California,” vanderbilt.edu, Aug. 2016
- Matthew Green and Jessica Carlton, “What Are Sanctuary Cities and How Are They Bracing for Trump’s Proposed Immigration Crackdown?,” kqed.org, Nov. 17, 2016
- Jasmine C. Lee, Rudy Omri, and Julia Preston, “What Are Sanctuary Cities?,” nytimes.com, Sep. 3, 2016
- Immigrant Legal Resource Center, “FAQ on Federal Grant Conditions and Cooperation with Immigration Enforcement,” ilrc.org, July 2016
- Legal Information Institute, “U.S. Code, Title 8, Chapter 12, Subchapter II, Part IX, § 1373,” law.cornell.edu (accessed Nov. 25, 2016)
- Bureau of Justice Assistance, “Office of Justice Programs Guidance Regarding Compliance with 8 U.S.C. § 1373,” bja.gov (accessed Nov. 25, 2016)
- Michael John Garcia, “ ‘Sanctuary Cities’: Legal Issues,” ilw.com, Jan. 15, 2009
- Christina Littlefield, “Sanctuary Cities: How Kathryn Steinle’s Death Intensified the Immigration Debate,” latimes.com, July 24, 2015
- Lee Romney, Cindy Chang, and Joel Rubin, “Fatal Shooting of S.F. Woman Reveals Disconnect Between ICE, Local Police; 5-Time Deportee Charged,” latimes.com, July 6, 2015
- Janie Har and Amy Taxin, “San Francisco’s Status as ‘Sanctuary’ Criticized After Slaying,” ap.org, July 7, 2015
- Jennifer Medina and Jess Bidgood, “Cities Vow to Fight Trump on Immigration, Even If They Lose Millions,” nytimes.com, Nov. 28, 2016
- Daryl F. Gates, “Special Order No. 40,” lapdonline.org, Nov. 27, 1979
- Jessica Vaughan, “Sanctuary Cities Continue to Obstruct Enforcement, Threaten Public Safety,” cis.org, Aug. 31, 2016
- Heather Mac Donald, “The Illegal-Alien Crime Wave,” city-journal.org, Winter 2004
- Josh Harkinson, “Actually, Sanctuary Cities Are Safer,” motherjones.com, July 10, 2015
- Nik Theodore, “Insecure Communities: Latino Perceptions of Police Involvement in Immigration Enforcement,” policylink.org, May 2013
- Bettina Boxall, “Violent Crime in California Rose 10% in 2015, State Attorney General Says,” latimes.com, July 1, 2016
- Jessica Vaughan, “Ignoring Detainers, Endangering Communities,” cis.org, July 2015
- Zoe Lofgren, “Sanctuary Cities Keep Communities Safe,” usnews.com, July 28, 2015
- Bryan Griffith and Jessica M. Vaughan, “Maps: Sanctuary Cities, Counties, and States,” cis.org, Apr. 16, 2019
- Catherine E. Shoichet, “Florida Just Banned Sanctuary Cities. At Least 11 Other States Have, Too,” cnn.com, June 14, 2019
- Brett Samuels, “Trump: Government Will Start Withholding Funds from Sanctuary Cities After Court Ruling,” thehill.com, Mar. 5, 2020
- Bryan Griffith and Jessica M. Vaughan, “Map: Sanctuary Cities, Counties, and States,” cis.org, Mar. 23, 2020
- Max Sullivan, “NH Rep. Wants to Ban Sanctuary Cities. He Put the Question on WHS School Ballot, “seacoastonline.com, Feb. 13, 2020
- KJRH News, “Bill Filed to Ban Sanctuary Cities in Oklahoma,” kjrh.com, Jan. 15, 2020
- Joshua Nelson, “Georgia Republicans Push Bill to Ban Sanctuary Cities: The President Is 100% Right,” foxnews.com, Feb. 25, 2020
- White House, “Remarks by President Trump and Vice President Pence in Roundtable with Industry Executives on the Plan for Opening Up America Again,” whitehouse.gov, Apr. 29, 2020
- Tobias Hoonhout, “Federal Appeals Court Rules Against Trump Admin. Move to Block Funding from Sanctuary Cities,” yahoo.com, May 1, 2020
- H.B.C., “What Are Sanctuary Cities?,” theeconomist.com, Nov. 22, 2016
- Adam Liptak, “Supreme Court Won’t Hear Case on California Sanctuary Law,” nytimes.com, June 15, 2020
- Rebecca Beitsch, “DOJ Rescinds Trump-Era ‘Sanctuary Cities’ Policy,” thehill.com, Apr. 28, 2021
- Jessica M. Vaughan and Bryan Griffith, “Map: Sanctuary Cities, Counties, and States,” cis.org, Mar. 22, 2021