small arm

Standardized patterns and parts

Flintlock small arms emerged at the start of industrialization, with weapons production becoming one of the first industrial sectors to exploit the transition from craft production to the large-scale production of the Industrial Revolution. On the military side, these weapons entered service at a time when the scale of ground forces employed in battle was increasing. The ability to manufacture large numbers of muskets enabled military leaders to equip these mass armies.

By the 1600s European military authorities had begun moving toward greater uniformity in order to eliminate mixed inventories of nonstandard weapons. England took the first steps toward creating a national system of small-arms manufacture. For years, completed muskets had been purchased from a variety of English, Irish, and Dutch gunmakers, who subcontracted for components and arranged for final assembly. Beginning in the early 1700s, ordnance officials, from their headquarters at the Tower of London, divided the manufacture of firearms into locks, stocks, barrels, ramrods, and furniture—all of which they sought to purchase directly from subcontractors. Since different components for the same weapon were made in different locations, Tower officials oversaw the establishment of “Sealed Patterns” (sample firearms) to serve as exact models for gunmakers.

An Ordnance Office decree of 1722 led to a standard army musket, called the “Long Land,” which had a 46-inch (1,168-mm) barrel and a calibre, or bore diameter, of .75 inch (19 mm). The Long Land became popularly known in America as the first model Brown Bess musket. Fighting experience in the wilderness of North America during the Seven Years’ War, or French and Indian War (1756–63), suggested the utility of lighter and shorter muskets, and in 1768 the Short Land musket, with a 42-inch barrel, became standard. Known as the second model Brown Bess, the Short Land became one of the basic weapons used in the American Revolution (1775–83). It was succeeded in 1797 by the “India Pattern,” with a 39-inch barrel. During the wars with Napoleon from 1804 to 1815, more than 1.6 million of these muskets were assembled in Birmingham, and nearly 2.7 million muskets of all types were “fitted up” in London and at the Lewisham Royal Armoury Mills. In 1816 assembly work was divided between London and a new Royal Small Arms Factory at Enfield Lock, Middlesex.

Are you a student?

Get a special academic rate on Britannica Premium.

Subscribe

In France, standard-pattern muskets did not exist prior to 1717, when the government specified a weapon with a 47-inch barrel and a calibre of .69 inch. (This calibre remained standard until the 19th century.) After the Seven Years’ War, the French army introduced the Modèle 1763, with a stronger lock and shorter (45-inch) barrel—a length that remained standard to century’s end. The Modèle 1777 musket represented a major step forward because of improved production techniques, with the French creating a rigorous system of patterns and gauges that yielded muskets with nearly interchangeable parts. This process was intended to produce less expensive muskets that were easier to make and repair, but worker resistance delayed large-scale manufacture of small arms using interchangeable parts until the early 1800s. Had the program succeeded earlier, France would have been better equipped to fight the Napoleonic Wars. As it was, French firms in such provincial cities as Charleville, Maubeuge, Saint-Étienne, and Tulle fabricated fewer than two million small arms.

The U.S. government created national armouries at Springfield, Massachusetts, and at Harpers Ferry, Virginia, in 1794; work at Springfield commenced in 1795, and arms production began at Harpers Ferry in 1801. Both built an Americanized version of the French Modèle 1777 musket (known as the Model 1795 in the United States). These armouries and their private competitors later became important centres of technological innovation. With the adoption of the .69-inch Model 1842, the U.S. military introduced the large-scale assembly of weapons from uniform, interchangeable parts. By the mid-1850s arms makers around the world were beginning to copy this “American System” of manufacture, which contributed to the creation of the modern military small arm—especially after the introduction of percussion ignition and rifled barrels.

Percussion ignition

The Model 1842 was based on the Model 1840 flintlock, but it featured a switch to percussion ignition. This newer system was based on the explosive property of potassium chlorate and fulminate of mercury, both of which detonate when struck a small, sharp blow by a striker. Several Germans experimented with detonating fulminates in the late 17th century, and the French did likewise in the 18th century, but it was Alexander John Forsyth, a Scottish clergyman, who successfully wedded priming powders to the ignition of firearms in 1805, receiving a patent in April 1807. Forsyth invented the “scent bottle” type of lock mechanism, so called because rotating on a tapered steel plug at about the location of a flintlock touchhole was a powder-filled container that looked like a perfume bottle. Turning the bottle upside down released some detonator powder into a cavity at the top of the plug, and turning the bottle back left the striker mechanism, consisting of a hammer rather than the cock and jaws of the flintlock, free to operate. When the trigger was pulled, the hammer fell, detonating the compound.

Subsequent inventors simplified the percussion lock mechanism by using loose or pellet detonating powder. By 1830, percussion caps (attributed to the Philadelphian Joshua Shaw in 1815) were becoming the accepted system for igniting firearm powder charges. A percussion cap was a truncated cone of metal (preferably copper) that contained a small amount of fulminate of mercury inside its crown, protected by foil and shellac. This cap was fitted onto a steel nipple mounted at the weapon’s breech, and a small channel in the nipple communicated the flash from the cap to the powder chamber. In the final form of this mechanism, a hollow-nosed percussion hammer came down over the percussion cap, thus eliminating the danger of flying copper when the powder detonated. Percussion cap ignition was easily adapted to existing flintlock muskets and pistols.

Early rifling

As killing machines, smoothbore infantry muskets were relatively inefficient. Their heavy round lead balls delivered bone-crushing and tissue-destroying blows when they hit a human body, but beyond 75 yards even trained infantrymen found it difficult to hit an individual adversary. Volley fire against massed troops delivered effective projectiles out to 200 yards, but at 300 yards balls from muzzle-loaders lost most of their lethality. Also, while well-trained soldiers could load and shoot their muskets five times per minute, volley fire led to a collective rate of only two to three shots per minute.

These ballistic shortcomings were a product of the requirement that the projectile, in order to be quickly rammed from muzzle to breech, had to fit loosely in the barrel. When discharged, it wobbled down the barrel, contributing to erratic flight after it left the muzzle. Rifled barrels, in which spiral grooves were cut into the bore, were known to improve accuracy by imparting a gyroscopic spin to the projectile, but reloading rifled weapons was slowed because the lead ball had to be driven into the barrel’s rifling. Greased cloth or leather patches eased the problem somewhat, but the rate of fire of rifles was still much lower than that of smoothbore muskets.

One possible solution was the creation of mechanisms that allowed the bullet to be loaded at the breech instead of the muzzle. Many such ideas were tested during the 18th century, but, given the craftsman-based manufacture of the day, none was suited to large-scale production. Special army units in Europe and America used rifled muzzle-loaders, such as the flintlock British Baker rifle, to harass the enemy at long ranges, while most infantrymen continued to carry muzzle-loading smoothbores. For this reason, inventors concentrated on adapting rifled barrels to muzzle-loaders. In 1826 Henri-Gustave Delvigne of France, seeking a means of expanding the projectile without making it difficult to ram home, created a narrow powder chamber at the breech end of the barrel against which a loosely fitting lead ball came to rest. Ramrod blows expanded the soft lead at the mouth of the chamber so that, when fired, the bullet fit the rifling tightly. In 1844 another French officer, Louis-Étienne de Thouvenin, introduced yet a better method for expanding bullets. His carabine à tige embodied a post or pillar (tige) at the breech against which the bullet was expanded.

Minié rifles

These rifles worked better than earlier types, but their deformed balls flew with reduced accuracy. Captain Claude-Étienne Minié, inspired by Delvigne’s later work with cylindrical bullets, designed longer, smaller-diameter projectiles, which, having the same weight as larger round balls, possessed greater cross-sectional density and therefore retained their velocity better. Moreover, while the flat base of Minié’s projectile was deformed against the pillar as in Thouvenin’s weapon, the rest of the bullet maintained its shape and accuracy. The French army combined these ideas in the Carabine Modèle 1846 à tige and the Fusil d’Infanterie Modèle 1848 à tige.

In order to combat the tendency of muzzle-loading rifles to become difficult to load as gunpowder residue collected in the barrels, Minié suggested a major simplification—eliminating the pillar and employing in its place a hollow-based bullet with an iron expander plug that caused the projectile to engage the rifling when the weapon was fired. This new projectile could be loaded into dirty rifles with ease, and, because it was not deformed while loading, it had greater accuracy.

Officials in several countries, notably Britain and the United States, saw the significance of Minié’s invention. In 1851 the Royal Small Arms Factory, Enfield, embarked upon production of the .702-inch Pattern 1851 Minié rifle. In the Crimean War (1854–56), Russian troops armed with smoothbore muskets were no match for Britons shooting P/51 rifles. Massed formations were easy prey, as were cavalry and artillery units. A correspondent for the Times of London wrote: “The Minié is king of weapons…the volleys of the Minié cleft [Russian soldiers] like the hand of the Destroying Angel.”

Swiss experiments demonstrated that an expander plug was not necessary when a bullet’s side walls were thin enough, and the British designed a smaller-calibre rifle using this type of Minié bullet. The result was a .577-inch weapon firing “cylindro-conoidal” projectiles—essentially a lead cylinder with a conical nose. “Enfield” as a weapon name was first generally applied to these Pattern 1853 rifles. Subsequent tests indicated that rifles with 33-inch barrels could provide accuracy equal to the 39-inch P/53 barrels. When the resulting P/53 Short Rifles were issued, there began a century-long trend toward shorter weapons.

In the United States, experiments undertaken in the late 1840s led to the adoption of a .58-inch Minié-type bullet and a family of arms designed to use it. The Model 1855 rifled musket, with a 40-inch barrel, produced a muzzle velocity of 950 feet (290 metres) per second. All Model 1855 weapons used mechanically operated tape priming, intended to eliminate the manual placement of percussion caps on the nipple, but this system proved too fragile and was eliminated with the introduction of a simplified Model 1861 rifled musket. During the American Civil War (1861–65), the Union government purchased both Model 1861 and Model 1863 rifled muskets as its basic infantry weapon. In the Confederacy, domestic production was supplemented by purchases of Enfield P/53 rifles and other European weapons.

The Civil War clearly demonstrated the deadly effect of rifled muskets, although many battlefield commanders only slowly appreciated the changing nature of warfare. Individual soldiers could hit their opposing numbers with accurate fire out to 250 yards, so that frontal assaults, in which soldiers advanced in neat ranks across open fields, had to be abandoned. By 1862 both sides were building field entrenchments and barricades to provide protection from rifle and artillery fire.

The bolt action

The American Civil War also previewed the importance of breech-loading rifles. For more than a century, soldiers carrying muzzle-loaders had been issued paper cartridges containing the musket ball and an appropriate powder charge. To use one of these cartridges, they simply bit off the end of the paper tube, poured a little powder into the pan (if the gun was a flintlock), dumped the rest down the barrel, and then rammed the ball and paper down on top. Some early breechloaders used slightly improved cartridges of nitrate-soaked paper or linen that contained the powder and ball and were inserted into the opened breech as a unit. The powder was set off when sparks from the flashpan ignited either the flammable case itself or exposed powder at the end of the cartridge. Other breechloaders employed metal cartridges that were pierced with holes or made with ends of flammable paper, so that the powder could be ignited by a percussion cap. But all of these systems, which relied upon externally mounted flintlock or percussion ignition mechanisms, were prone to misfiring, and they did little to prevent the leakage of gas and flame for which breechloaders were notorious. Breech-loading rifles became practical only with the design of cartridges that housed the primer as well as the propellant in a single case, and that provided an effective seal when the weapon was fired.

The first such cartridge to be successfully employed in war was of the rimfire type, in which a ring of detonating fulminate was deposited in a hollow rim around the base of a thin copper case. An external hammer crushed the rim in one spot, firing the round. Unfortunately, some fulminate compounds detonated unpredictably, leading to both misfires and premature explosions. Also, a cartridge case that was soft enough to be crushed by a striker could not stand up to the heavy propellant charge necessary for a full-power infantry rifle. For this reason, rimfire cartridges were used most effectively in pistols or—during the American Civil War—in smaller repeating carbines such as the .56-inch Spencer and the .44-inch Henry.

In Europe, a milestone in the development of breech-loading infantry weapons was achieved by Johann Nikolaus Dreyse, a Prussian. His Zündnadelgewehr (“needle-fired gun”), introduced in 1838, used a paper cartridge with a priming pellet located at the base of a solid egg-shaped bullet. A long, needle-shaped firing pin, shot forward by a spring, pierced the cartridge and powder charge to detonate the primer. This needle was housed in a steel cylinder called the bolt, which slid forward in the frame of the receiver until it was locked firmly against the base of the cartridge in the chamber. Once the weapon was fired, the soldier released a latch with his thumb, grasped a knob at the end of a handle projecting from the bolt, turned it until locking lugs on the bolt were disengaged from slots in the receiver, and slid the bolt back to open the chamber for reloading. This bolt action, simple in concept and yet requiring precise workmanship, constituted a revolution in small-arms design.

The first Dreyse rifles were adopted by the Prussian army in 1843 and were used in campaigns in 1849 and 1864. In 1866, notably at the Battle of Königgrätz during the Seven Weeks’ War, Prussian soldiers lying prone were able to fire six shots from their 15.43-mm (.607-inch) Zündnadelgewehr Modell 1862 for every one discharged from their Austrian opponents’ muzzle-loading rifles.

Prussia’s success encouraged other European states to adopt bolt-action breechloaders. The French employed Antoine-Alphonse Chassepot’s 11-mm Fusil d’Infanterie Modèle 1866 to devastating effect in such battles of the Franco-German War (1870–71) as Mars-la-Tour and Gravelotte. Close-order troop formations disappeared from the European scene as a result of these fights, and the cavalry charge was relegated to the past. The Chassepot rifle employed a shorter firing pin than the Dreyse, because its cartridge was fitted with a detonating cap at the very base. About 1.03 million of these weapons were in hand when the war began, and Prussia had some 1.15 million Dreyse needle rifles—a quantity that demonstrated the value of machine production of weapons with interchangeable parts.

Needle rifles offered a faster rate of fire, but their paper cartridges provided a poor seal at the breech, and their long firing pins warped or broke under heavy use. One solution was the metallic centre-fire cartridge with a percussion cap centred in the base of a hard brass or copper case. A shorter, sturdier firing pin was sufficient to detonate the primer, and a metallic case that was strong enough to withstand a powerful propellant charge also provided effective closure of the breech. Adopting centre-fire cartridges, France transformed its Chassepots into the 11-mm Modèle 1866/67 and 1874 rifles, which were named after their designer, Basile Gras. Germany went to rifles designed by Peter Paul Mauser, first the 11-mm Modell 1871 Gewehr and then the Modell 1871/84 Infanterie-Repetier-Gewehr. The latter was a 10-shot repeater that ejected the spent case as the bolt was pulled back and fed a fresh cartridge into the chamber from a tubular magazine beneath the barrel as the bolt was pushed forward.

All other European countries soon adopted cartridge breech-loading rifles, usually by converting existing muzzle-loaders and then by purchasing purpose-built breechloaders. Many did not feature bolt action. For example, beginning in 1866, Britain converted its P/53 Enfields simply by hinging the top of the breech so that it could be opened sideways, the spent case extracted, and a fresh cartridge inserted. In 1871 the British went to new Martini-Henry breechloaders of .45-inch calibre. In these rifles, pushing down a lever attached to the trigger guard lowered the entire breechblock, exposing the chamber, and raised the breechblock back to firing position when it was pulled back. Russia adopted two new 10-mm breechloaders, the Model 1868 Berdan No. 1 and then the bolt-action Model 1870 Berdan No. 2, both of which were largely the work of American Civil War officer Hiram Berdan. The U.S.-made Remington Rolling Block Rifle, in which the breechblock was cocked back on a hinge like the hammer, was bought by a number of countries around the world. The United States itself adopted a series of single-shot rifles employing a hinged-breech “trap-door” mechanism, developed by Erskine S. Allin at the Springfield Armory, in which the top of the breech was flipped forward along the top of the barrel. The first Model 1866 was a converted .58-inch musket, the second Model 1866 was a new rifle in .50-inch calibre, and subsequent versions were built in .45-inch calibre. These weapons, born of postwar starvation budgets, continued to use components introduced with the Model 1855 muzzle-loaders.

The smokeless powder revolution

All early breechloaders used black powder as their source of propellant energy, but in the early 1880s more powerful and cleaner-burning nitrocellulose-based propellants were perfected. Whereas black powder produced a large quantity of solid material upon combustion, quickly fouling barrels and pouring out huge clouds of smoke, nitrocellulose produced mostly gas and was therefore labeled “smokeless powder.” Also, it produced three times the energy of black powder and burned at a more controllable rate. Such characteristics made possible a shift to longer and smaller-diameter projectiles. Bore diameters were again reduced, this time to calibres of about .30 inch, or 7.5 to 8 mm. Muzzle velocities ranged from 2,000 to 2,800 feet per second, and accurate range extended to 1,000 yards and beyond. Because lead projectiles were too soft to be used at such increased power and velocity, they were sheathed in harder metal. In 1881 a Swiss officer, Eduard Alexander Rubin, was the first to perfect a full-length copper-jacketed bullet.

Magazine repeaters

France was the first country to issue a small-bore high-velocity repeating rifle, the Modèle 1886 Lebel, which fired an 8-mm smokeless powder round. The tubular magazine of this rifle soon became obsolete, however. In 1885 Ferdinand Mannlicher of Austria had introduced a boxlike magazine fitted into the bottom of the rifle in front of the trigger guard. This magazine was easily loaded by a device called a clip, a light metal openwork box that held five cartridges and fed them up into the chamber through the action of a spring as each spent case was ejected. Other magazine rifles, such as the Mauser, used a different loading device, called a charger. This was simply a flat strip of metal with its edges curled to hook over the rims or grooves of a row of cartridges (also usually five). To load his rifle, a soldier drew back the bolt, slipped the charger into position above the opened receiver, and pushed the cartridges down into the magazine, where they were held in tension against a spring. The efficiency of the box magazine was quickly recognized, as was its special compatibility with the bolt action, and all European states made the conversion. For example, Germany adopted the 8-mm Model 1888 Commission rifle, Belgium the 7.65-mm Model 1889 Mauser, Turkey the Model 1890 Mauser, and Russia the 7.62-mm Model 1891 Mosin-Nagant. In 1892 Britain abandoned movable-block action and went to the .303-inch, bolt-action Lee-Metford, and the United States began to purchase the .30-inch Model 1892 Krag-Jørgensen, a Danish design. In 1906 Japan adopted the 6.5-mm Year 38 Arisaka rifle.

By World War I (1914–18) all major powers adopted smokeless powder, bolt-action, magazine-fed repeating rifles, and some had shifted to a second generation. Austria, for example, issued the Modell 1895 Mannlicher, firing an 8-mm round, and German troops carried the 7.92-mm Modell 1898, designed by Mauser. For durability, safety, and efficiency, the 1898 Mauser was probably the epitome of bolt-action military rifles. It was sold and copied around the world. In the United States the Mauser was only slightly altered and issued as the .30-inch M1903 Springfield.

Also following Germany’s lead in the design of ammunition, all armies replaced their blunt-nosed projectiles with aerodynamically superior pointed bullets (in German, Spitzgeschossen). Barrel lengths continued to decrease, partly in response to more efficient propellants and partly to make rifles easier to use in the field. The British .303-inch Short, Magazine, Lee-Enfield rifle, known as the SMLE, had a 25-inch barrel, while the M1903 Springfield’s barrel measured just over 23.75 inches.

During the Great War, huge quantities of rifles were built. British factories made more than 3.9 million rifles, German sources produced about 5 million, and Russian factories built more than 9 million. Still, most armies suffered from shortages. Factories in the United States made 1.24 million rifles for the British and 280,000 for the Russians; for U.S. forces they produced 2.4 million between May 1917 and December 1918 alone.

The self-loading rifle

Magazine-fed rifles provided a radical increase in rate of fire. Indeed, by 1914 many British riflemen could fire 15 aimed shots per minute, and some very skillful individuals could exceed 30 shots per minute. Nevertheless, in order to transcend the limits imposed by manual operation, gun designers such as Mannlicher and the American Hiram Maxim came up with experimental self-loading, or semiautomatic, rifles, which used the energy generated by a fired round to load a fresh round into the chamber. However, only a handful of these weapons were adopted in very small numbers by the major armies, whose interest in automatic fire from the 1880s through World War I was directed primarily toward heavier infantry-support weapons (see below Machine guns).

After the war, all nations having an arms industry sought to produce a semiautomatic rifle, but only the United States was successful in developing and manufacturing a battle-worthy weapon. Adopted in 1936, the U.S. Rifle, Caliber .30 M1, designed by John C. Garand, was a technological tour de force. A small hole or gas port on the underside of its barrel near the muzzle directed part of the propellant gases into a small cylinder holding a piston that was connected to the bolt. As gas pressure forced back the piston and bolt, the empty cartridge case was ejected and the hammer was cocked. A spring then forced the bolt forward. As it moved forward, the bolt stripped the top cartridge from an eight-round, clip-loaded magazine within the receiver and seated it in the chamber, ready to fire. Gas pressure thus performed automatically the reloading task formerly done by hand.

As the only semiautomatic rifle to become a standard-issue infantry weapon, the M1 was extremely durable and reliable in combat. Between 1937 and 1945, the Springfield Armory and the Winchester Repeating Arms Company produced 4.04 million of these rifles. Still, the infantry units of most other belligerents during World War II (1939–45) were armed with bolt-action rifles of the World War I era as their standard weapons.

The submachine gun

The ballistic performance of infantry rifles was tailored to the long-range requirements of a bygone era when foot soldiers demanded weapons that could reach out to halt the dreaded cavalry charge. Beginning early in World War I, however, battlefields became no-man’s-lands pockmarked by shell craters and crisscrossed by miles of barbed-wire entanglements, and machine guns dominated the 1,000 or more yards between trench lines. While rifles were shot at those extreme ranges, they could not equal the destructive power of artillery and machine guns, and they were too cumbersome and powerful for offensive assaults on enemy trenches. A generation later, in World War II, the greater mobility of troops accompanying armoured vehicles reinforced the need for lighter, more portable weapons of improved effectiveness at close quarters.

Such changing conditions led to experiments with automatic weapons firing rounds of lower velocity or lighter weight. One result, which saw its first use in World War I, was a new weapon called the machine carbine or submachine gun. Derived from the semiautomatic pistol and firing pistol-calibre ammunition with muzzle velocities of only about 1,000 feet per second, submachine guns were fitted with shoulder stocks (and sometimes forward hand grips). Such weapons offered easier handling than rifles while providing greater accuracy and more rapid fire than most handguns.

The first successful weapon of this type was the Maschinen Pistole 1918 Bergmann, designed by Hugo Schmeisser and employed by the Germans during the last few months of the war. The barrel of the MP18 was less than eight inches long, and it was chambered for 9-mm rounds introduced in 1908 for Parabellum, or Luger, pistols. It operated under a principle called blowback, in which the spent cartridge case, blown backward out of the chamber by the gases generated by the firing of the round, forced the bolt back against a spring and tripped the mechanism that ejected the case from the gun. The spring then forced the bolt forward as a fresh cartridge was fed into the chamber. If the trigger was kept depressed, the new round would be fired automatically, and the cycle would continue until the trigger was released or the ammunition was exhausted. In blowback actions, the bolt had to be quite heavy, or it had to be subjected to various devices that retarded its backward motion, in order to keep the mechanism from operating faster than was desired. In the MP18, a heavy bolt and spring limited the weapon’s rate of fire to about 400 rounds per minute.

After the war, Vasily Degtyarev of the Soviet Union incorporated Schmeisser’s principles into his own designs, culminating in the Pistolet Pulemyot Degtyarova of 1940. The PPD was fed by a drum-shaped magazine containing 71 7.62-mm cartridges, and it fired at a rate of 900 rounds per minute—far too fast for accuracy. In the United States, John T. Thompson’s submachine gun, chambered for the .45-inch Colt pistol cartridge, was adopted by the army in 1928. Popularly called the “tommy gun,” the M1928 was effective, but its blowback operation was modified by a complex retarding mechanism that was deleted from later versions, when its large drum magazine was also replaced by a box magazine.

Under the pressures of World War II, the major powers used millions of submachine guns. These included a second generation of simplified weapons that, being fabricated partly from sheet-metal stampings, could be produced in quantity almost anywhere and at little expense. The Germans led the way with the MP38 and MP40. Known to the Allies as “burp guns,” these weapons operated at 450 to 550 rounds per minute, the optimal rate for controlled fire. Also, they were fed by a box magazine, which did not jam as often as a drum, and had a wire shoulder stock that could be folded against the receiver. Meanwhile, the Soviets issued en masse the PPSh of 1941 and the PPS of 1943. The latter closely resembled the new German guns, as did the United States’ M3, called the “grease gun” for its resemblance to a mechanic’s grease dispenser. The British Sten gun, extremely simple and inexpensive yet very effective, was issued to paratroops and commandos beginning in 1941 and was also smuggled to partisans in Europe.

1 of 2

2 of 2

After the war, almost all new submachine guns, such as the British Sterling and West German MP5, were chambered for 9-mm cartridges. As a class of weapon, they received a new lease on life with the telescoping bolt, pioneered by Václav Holek in the Czechoslovak Model 23 of 1948. This involved a hollowed-out bolt that slid partially over the barrel when a round was chambered, resulting in a much shorter weapon. A prominent example of this type was the Israeli Uzi, designed by Uziel Gal, which was only 25 inches long with its shoulder stock extended. The Uzi was adopted around the world as a police and counterterrorist weapon. Indeed, aside from arming special forces, the submachine gun lost importance as a military weapon. With an effective range limited to about 200 yards, it could not fill the broad gap between the low-power pistol cartridge and the full-power rifle cartridge. This gap, which constituted the ground upon which modern infantrymen found themselves fighting, had to be filled by another new weapon, which would fire a cartridge of intermediate power.