Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions
- Context:
- nonviolence
Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions, (BDS), decentralized Palestinian-led movement of nonviolent resistance to Israel’s treatment of Palestinians. The movement advocates punitive measures against the state of Israel, including boycotts, divestment, and economic sanctions. BDS initiatives demand an end to Israel’s occupation of the West Bank (including East Jerusalem), the Gaza Strip, and the Golan Heights, the granting of full equality to Palestinian citizens of Israel, and the respect and promotion of a right of return for Palestinian refugees. According to the official website of the BDS movement, the movement pushes for “freedom, justice and equality,” guided by the “simple principle that Palestinians are entitled to the same rights as the rest of humanity.”
BDS does not advocate for a specific outcome, such as a two-state solution, in which Israel and Palestine would exist as separate states for Israeli Jews and Palestinian Arabs, respectively, or a one-state solution, in which Jews and Palestinians would live as equal citizens in one country. Many critics believe that meeting the movement’s demands would necessitate that Israel no longer exist as a Jewish state. The state of Israel, along with many Jewish institutions in the Diaspora, therefore condemn BDS as anti-Semitic. BDS avers that the movement “does not tolerate any act or discourse which adopts or promotes” anti-Semitism and draws a distinction between anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism. The movement vocally compares Zionism, the movement to create a Jewish national state in the ancient homeland of the Jewish people, to colonialism. Proponents of Zionism counter that Jews, lacking a homeland other than Israel, do not represent any colonial power and that Zionism seeks self-determination, not exploitation. Moreover, the BDS movement asserts that Israel engages in a form of apartheid, a regime of racial segregation that once existed in South Africa. Israel and its allies, most notably the United States, forcefully reject the comparison to apartheid in South Africa, arguing that Israel’s policies regarding the occupied territories are driven by security concerns rather than racial discrimination and noting that the Palestinians who live in Israel and have Israeli citizenship share the same legal rights as Jewish Israelis.
Background and origin
The BDS movement was officially launched in 2005 by a coalition of more than 170 Palestinian unions, professional associations, refugee networks, women’s associations, and other bodies of Palestinian civil society, which together called on organizations and individuals to “impose broad boycotts and implement divestment initiatives against Israel similar to those applied to South Africa in the apartheid era.”
Many observers identify the 2001 United Nations World Conference Against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance in Durban, South Africa, as an antecedent to the official launch of BDS. Occurring at the height of the second intifada, the conference revived previous arguments regarding the relationship between Zionism and racism and demonstrated to the future organizers of BDS that support exists in the West for the Palestinian struggle for self-determination. Some pro-Israel commentators characterized the Durban conference, from which the U.S. and Israeli delegations walked out, as a cesspool of anti-Jewish rhetoric.
Impact of the movement
Since the 2005 BDS call to action, hundreds of campaigns have been launched around the world targeting corporations, universities, and individuals with financial interests in Israel. Students at dozens of universities in the United States and the United Kingdom, including Columbia University, the University of Minnesota, and the University of Manchester, have passed nonbinding resolutions or referendums recommending that university governing bodies divest from Israel. By 2024, some 160 BDS measures had been considered by student governments at more than 70 colleges and universities in the United States; about 60 measures had passed. University leaders have largely declined to act on the recommendations.
The impact of BDS initiatives on Israel’s economy is unclear. Despite an Israeli government report that leaked in 2015 and estimated that BDS may cost the Israeli economy $1.4 billion per year, the Israeli economy has evolved to become more resilient to boycotts, according to a 2018 analysis by the Brookings Institution. Although the BDS movement takes inspiration from the sanctions movement against South African apartheid, the Brookings analysis contends that Israel’s exports are far less substitutable, consisting of high-technology goods, advanced machinery, and pharmaceuticals that are difficult or impossible to get from another source.
In addition to economic restrictions, the BDS movement advocates an academic and cultural rejection of Israel. A common BDS strategy has been to urge musical artists and celebrities to not visit or perform in Israel. This tactic has garnered some success for the movement, as performers including Sam Smith, Lorde, and Lauryn Hill have canceled concerts in Israel.
Anti-BDS campaign
In 2011 the Israeli Knesset passed a bill imposing civil penalties on groups or individuals in Israel who declare a commercial embargo on Israel or any group within its territory. In 2017 the Knesset passed a law banning foreign nationals who support BDS from entering the country. The Israeli government has also embarked on extensive efforts to mitigate support for the BDS movement abroad.
Outside Israel, anti-BDS efforts have included legislation that levies consequences on individuals and groups who engage in a boycott of Israel. Some laws take the form of nonbinding resolutions that condemn BDS, such as those declaring BDS to be anti-Semitic and affirming unconditional support for the state of Israel. Countries that have passed anti-BDS legislation include Canada, Spain, Germany, and Austria. By early 2024, 38 U.S. states had taken measures against the BDS movement.
Charges of anti-Semitism
The extent to which the BDS movement may be considered anti-Semitic is fiercely contested, and the debate is caught up in broader discussions of which criticisms of Israel cross into anti-Semitism (see anti-Semitism: Anti-Semitism in the 21st century). According to the Anti-Defamation League, some advocates and activists of BDS initiatives have employed classic anti-Semitic tropes, and BDS campaigns have sometimes resulted “in the isolation and intimidation of Jews and supporters of Israel.” Some opponents who charge the BDS movement with anti-Semitism further argue that the origins of the movement can be traced to the Arab League’s 1945 call to boycott Jewish businesses to resist Zionism. They claim that the alleged connection between BDS and the Arab League boycott, which predates Israel, proves that BDS seeks to target Jews in general, rather than the policies of Israel in particular. Many also contend that because BDS singles out the world’s only Jewish country for negative economic consequences, the effort is necessarily anti-Semitic.
Supporters of BDS note that the movement explicitly condemns anti-Semitism. They further counter that their opposition to Israeli government policies is conflated with anti-Semitism in an effort to delegitimize the BDS movement. They acknowledge opposition to Zionism, an ideology which they contend disenfranchises and suppresses the basic human rights of Palestinians. Many supporters of Israel take aim at that opposition to Zionism. For instance, in an address to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) in 2019, U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo claimed that “anti-Zionism is anti-Semitism.”