Quick Facts
English:
Dravidian Progressive Federation
Date:
1949 - present

Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK), regional political party in India, principally in the southeastern state of Tamil Nadu.

The party traces its origins to the pro-Tamil activities of E.V. Ramaswami Naicker and others in the first half of the 20th century. The DMK itself was founded in 1949 in Madras (now Chennai) under the leadership of C.N. Annadurai following a split in the Dravidian Federation (Dravida Kazhagam) party. In its early years the DMK espoused the secession of Madras state (since 1968 Tamil Nadu) from the Indian union and the establishment of an independent country for the region’s Dravidian population. Following India’s 1962 border war with China, however, the party transformed itself into a nationalistic movement advocating the betterment of the Dravidian population in Tamil Nadu as well as in Sri Lanka. The DMK also voiced strenuous opposition to the imposition of Hindi, India’s predominant national language, on the Tamil-speaking population of southern India, and it participated in anti-Hindi movements in Tamil Nadu.

Political success was slow to come for the DMK. Future party leader Muthuvel Karunanidhi ran as an independent and won a seat in the Madras state legislative assembly in 1957. However, the party did not officially offer a slate of candidates for assembly elections until 1962, when it won 50 of the chamber’s 206 seats and came in second behind the ruling Indian National Congress (Congress Party). The anti-Hindi campaign in the mid-1960s took the DMK to greater prominence, and it triumphed over Congress in the 1967 state assembly elections, garnering 137 of the 234 seats. Party president Annadurai became chief minister (head of government) and oversaw the renaming of the state. Following Annadurai’s death in 1969, his protégé Karunanidhi became both the DMK president and Tamil Nadu’s chief minister. He led the DMK to its second successive victory, in the 1971 assembly elections.

In 1972 the DMK split in two when one of its most prominent members, Maruthur Gopala Ramachandran (popularly known as MGR), formed his own party, the All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (All India Dravidian Progressive Federation; AIADMK). The schism not only eroded the popularity of the DMK but also initiated a prolonged phase of bitter enmity between the two parties. The rancor only worsened after MGR died in 1987, and the AIADMK’s leadership passed into the hands of Jayalalitha Jayaram.

The DMK has had mixed electoral fortunes in the state assembly elections since 1972, winning assembly elections and control of the state government in 1989, 1996, and 2006 and losing power to the AIADMK in the 1991, 2001, and 2011 elections. In addition, the party’s popularity was damaged by allegations of corruption leveled against a number of DMK leaders, notably Karunanidhi’s daughter K. Kanimozhi, in 2010. A 2006 DMK election promise to distribute a television set to each household in the state apparently was not enough to overcome the taint of corruption during the 2011 assembly elections, as the DMK won only 31 seats. The DMK regained power in 2021 after beating the AIADMK in the state assembly election. M.K. Stalin, son of Karunanidhi, who died in 2018, assumed the office of chief minister and was reelected to the post in 2021.

At the national level, the DMK also began competing in elections to the Lok Sabha (lower chamber of the Indian parliament) in 1962, when it won seven seats from Madras state. Its performance in subsequent elections to the chamber rose and fell, but by the 1999 contest the number of seats won had become relatively stable. The party has shifted its alliances, generally partnering with either the Congress Party or the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), which has allowed the DMK to control a large share of Tamil Nadu’s members in the Lok Sabha. In the 1999 parliamentary elections, the DMK allied with the BJP-led National Democratic Alliance coalition and won 26 of 39 seats. The party did even better in the 2004 elections after it allied itself with Congress and other, smaller parties to garner all 39 seats. That victory enabled the DMK to have seven ministers in the Congress-led United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government. The DMK-Congress alliance continued with the 2009 polls and resulted in a combined 27 Lok Sabha seats (18 of them from the DMK) and a total of five DMK ministers in the UPA government.

The DMK has used its position in New Delhi to secure its interests in Tamil Nadu. It was able to persuade the UPA government in 2004 to declare Tamil the country’s first classical language. Likewise, in March 2013 the DMK withdrew its support of the UPA government (including the resignation of its five ministers) after the government decided not to bring a resolution in the parliament condemning alleged atrocities committed by Sri Lankan forces against Tamils during that country’s long civil war. The party was thoroughly trounced in the 2014 Lok Sabha elections, as it failed to win a single seat in the chamber. The DMK improved its performance in the Lok Sabha polls of 2019 and 2024, winning more than 20 seats each time.

Are you a student?
Get a special academic rate on Britannica Premium.
Shanthie Mariet D'Souza

Dravidian languages, family of some 70 languages spoken primarily in South Asia. The Dravidian languages are spoken by more than 215 million people in India, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka.

The Dravidian languages are divided into South, South-Central, Central, and North groups; these groups are further organized into 24 subgroups. The four major literary languages—Telugu, Tamil, Malayalam, and Kannada—are recognized by the constitution of India. They are also the official languages of the states of Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu, Kerala, and Karnataka (formerly Mysore), respectively.

The history of the Dravidian languages

There is considerable literature on the theory that India is a linguistic area where different language families have developed convergent structures through extensive regional and societal bilingualism. It is now well established that the Indo-Aryan and Dravidian language families developed convergent structures in sound system (phonology) and grammar owing to contact going back to the 2nd millennium bce. The earliest varieties of Indo-Aryan are forms of Sanskrit. More than a dozen Dravidian loanwords can be found among the Sanskrit hymns of the Rigveda (composed c. 1500 bce), including ulūkhala- ‘mortar,’ kuṇḍa ‘pit,’ khála- ‘threshing floor,’ kāṇá- ‘one-eyed,’ and mayūra ‘peacock.’ The introduction of retroflex consonants (those produced by the tongue tip raised against the middle of the hard palate) has also been credited to contact between speakers of Sanskrit and those of the Dravidian languages.

The presence of Dravidian loanwords in the Rigveda implies that Dravidian and Aryan speakers were, by the time of its composition, fused into one speech community in the great Indo-Gangetic Plain, while independent communities of Dravidian speakers had moved to the periphery of the Indo-Aryan area (Brahui in the northwest, Kurukh-Malto in the east, and Gondi-Kui in the east and central India). Notably, the most ancient forms of the Dravidian languages are found in southern India, which was not exposed to Sanskrit until the 5th century bce. This suggests that the south was populated by the speakers of the Dravidian languages even before the entry of Aryan speakers into India.

The word drāviḍa/drāmiḍa and its adjectival forms occur in Classical Sanskrit literature from the 3rd century bce as the name of a country and its people. Drāviḍa as the name of a language occurs in Kumarila-Bhatta’s Tantravartika (“Exposition on the Sacred Sciences”) of approximately the 7th century ce. In these and almost all similar cases, there is reason to believe that the name referred to the Tamil country, Tamil people, and Tamil language. Robert Caldwell, the Scottish missionary and bishop who wrote the first comparative grammar of the Dravidian languages (1856), argued that the term sometimes referred ambiguously to South Indian people and their languages; he adopted it as a generic name for the whole family since Tamil (tamiẓ) was already the established name of a specific language.

Buddhist engravings on wall in Thailand. Hands on wall. Hompepage blog 2009, history and society, science and technology, geography and travel, explore discovery
Britannica Quiz
Languages & Alphabets

Caldwell and other scholars have postulated that several words from Greek, Latin, and Hebrew are Dravidian in origin. The authenticity of many of these claims has been disputed, although two items seem plausible. The first is the Greek oruza/oryza/orynda ‘rice,’ which must be compared with Proto-Dravidian *war-inci (the asterisk denotes a reconstruction based on attested descendant forms, in this case the Tamil-Malayalam-Telugu wari, Parji verci(l), Gadaba varci(l), and Gondi wanji ‘rice, paddy’) and not with Tamil arisi (South Dravidian *ariki) as proposed by Caldwell.

In the second case, the Greek ziggiberis/zingiberis ‘ginger’ derives from the South Dravidian nominal compound *cinki-wēr (Proto-Dravidian *wēr ‘root’), Pali singi and singivera, Sanskrit s’ṛṅgavera-, and Tamil-Malayalam iñci (derived from *cinki by loss of *c and by changing -ki to -ci after a front vowel). A number of place-names of South India cited by Pliny the Elder (1st century ce) and Ptolemy (2nd century ce) end in -our or -oura, which correspond to the place-name suffix -ūr ‘town’ from Proto-Dravidian *ūr.

Are you a student?
Get a special academic rate on Britannica Premium.

Dravidian studies

In 1816, Englishman Francis Whyte Ellis of the Indian Civil Service (at the time a division of the East India Company) introduced the notion of a Dravidian family. His Dissertation of the Telugu Language was initially published as “Note to the Introduction” of British linguist A.D. Campbell’s A Grammar of the Teloogoo Language. Ellis’s monograph provided lexical and grammatical evidence to support the hypothesis that Tamil, Telugu, Kannada, Malayalam, Tulu, Kodagu, and Malto were members of “the family of languages which may be appropriately called the dialects of Southern India.”

The next major publication on the Dravidian languages was Robert Caldwell’s A Comparative Grammar of the Dravidian or South Indian Family of Languages (1856). A missionary who left his native Scotland for a lifetime of work in India, he demonstrated that the Dravidian languages were not genetically related to Sanskrit, thus disproving a view that had been held by Indian scholars for more than two millennia. Caldwell identified 12 Dravidian languages; to the 7 already noted by Ellis, he added Toda and Kota of South Dravidian, Gondi and Kui-Kuvi of South-Central Dravidian, and Kurukh of North Dravidian. He also discussed Brahui.

The 20th century was marked by considerable research and publication on the Dravidian language family and its members, particularly in three realms of study. The first was the collection of cognates (related words) and the discovery of sound correspondences (related sounds) among the different languages; these led to the reconstruction of the hypothetical parent language called Proto-Dravidian. The second area of investigation focused on the study of the various inscriptions, literary texts, and regional dialects of the four literary languages, which allowed scholars to identify the historical evolution of those languages. A third area of interest involved the discovery and linguistic description of new languages within the family.

Several new languages were added to the Dravidian family in the 20th century, including Kota, Kolami, Parji, Pengo, Ollari, Konda/Kubi, Kondekor Gadaba, Irula, and Toda. Progress was also made in describing nonliterary languages, notably Brahui, Kurukh, Malto, Kui, Kuvi, Gondi (various dialects), Kodagu, and Tulu.

The most significant and monumental work of the 20th century was A Dravidian Etymological Dictionary ([DED] 1961; revised 1984) by British linguist Thomas Burrow and Canadian linguist Murray B. Emeneau. Much that has been accomplished in comparative phonology and reconstruction is indebted to this work. The early 21st century saw a continuation of studies in comparative morphology, though much work on the comparative syntax of the family remains to be done.