The custom of communal banquets has been preserved into modern times in Russia in the bratchina (from brat, “brother”), in the mol’ba (“entreaty” or “supplication”), and in the kanun (a short religious service); in the Serbian slava (“glorification”); and in the sobor (“assembly”) and kurban (“victim” or “prey”) of Bulgaria. Formerly, communal banquets were also held by the Poles and the Polabs (Elbe Slavs) of Hannover. In Russia the love feasts are dedicated to the memory of a deceased person or to the patron saint of the village and in Serbia to the protecting saint from whom the rod or pleme (“clan”) took its name. Scholars no longer have any doubts of the pre-Christian nature of these banquets. The Serbian slava is clearly dedicated to a saint held to be the founder of the clan. These saints are patrons or founders and are all men who have died. When the Serbs celebrate the slava of the prophet Elijah or of the archangel Michael, they do not set out the “dead man’s plate” (the koljivo, boiled wheat), because Elijah and Michael are not considered dead. In certain localities in Serbia, even the women given in marriage to another clan, the so-called odive, have to be present at the slava. They return with their children (according to the ancient matrilineal conception of the offspring), but not with their husbands, who belong to another clan and celebrate another slava. More akin to the ancient pagan feasts of the Baltic is the Serbian seoska slava, or “slava of the village,” in which the whole community participates and consumes in common the flesh of the victims prepared in the open air. Such feasts are votive. In Russia sometimes the animals (or their flesh) are first brought into the church and perfumed with incense. Even at the beginning of the 20th century, there were small villages in Russia where cattle were butchered only on the occasion of these festivities, three or four times a year. The Homily of Opatoviz (attributed to Herman, bishop of Prague) of the 10th–11th centuries emphatically condemns the love feasts as well as the veneration of statues and Slavic worship of the dead and veneration of saints as if they were gods. As in the Christian era the saints entered the line of ancestors, so perhaps in pagan antiquity ancient divinities (Perun, Svarog) were taken over as tribal progenitors. The Slavs did not record genealogies, and the founders of their clans were mainly legendary. The social unit sought to assure for itself the favour of powerful figures of the past, even of more than one, representing them in several forms on the same pillar or giving to their statues supernumerary bodily parts that would express their superhuman powers. A hollow bronze idol, probably ancient Russian, was found at Ryazan, Russia. The idol has four faces with a fifth face on its breast.

The eastern Finns and the Ugrians venerated their dead in the same way, similarly representing them as polycephalic (multiple-headed), and also held communal banquets in their honour. Wooden buildings (the so-called continae) in which the faithful Baltic Slavs used to assemble for amusement, to deliberate, or to cook food have been observed in the 20th century among the Votyaks, the Cheremis, and the Mordvins but especially among the Votyaks. Such wooden buildings also existed sparsely in Slavic territory in the 19th century, in Russia, in Ukraine, and in various locales among the South Slavs.

If it is supposed that, as among the Finns and the Ugrians, each clan venerated its own divine ancestor in a separate building, this would explain why many sacred enclosures would contain more than one contina—three at Carentia (the island of Garz at the mouth of the Oder River) and four at Szczecin.

The system of idolatry of the Baltic area was essentially manistic (pertaining to worship of ancestors). It is not irrelevant that until the 19th century there survived here and there throughout the Danubian-Balkan region the custom of reopening graves three, five, or seven years after interment, taking out the bones of the corpses, washing them, wrapping them in new linen, and reinterring them. Detailed descriptions of this procedure have come particularly from Macedonia and Slovenia. Among East and West Slavs only faint echoes of the custom of a second interment survive in folk songs. In the former guberniya (province) of Vladimir, east of Moscow, as late as 1914, when a grave was to be dug, a piece of cloth was taken along with which to wrap the bones of any earlier corpse that might be unearthed in the process of digging. Such corpses would then be reinterred with the newly deceased. In protohistoric times the tumuli (mounds) of the mortuaries of the Krivichi, a populous tribe of the East Slavs of the northwest, the so-called long kurgans (burial mounds), contained cinerary urns buried in the tumulus together and all at one time. Such a practice could occur only as the consequence of collective and simultaneous cremation. There must, therefore, have existed a periodic cremation season or date, as for the opening of the tombs in Macedonia and as has been verified elsewhere in comparing the South Asian areas of second interment, in preparation for which the corpses are temporarily exhumed. The cremations by the Krivichi are of exhumed bones. In the Volga region today the Mordvins still burn the disinterred bones of the dead in the flames of a “living fire” ignited by friction.

Considering the religious past of the Slavs, it is not surprising that manism was strong enough to epitomize and overwhelm all or practically all of their religious views. The seasonal festivals of the Slavs turn out to be almost entirely dedicated to the dead, very often without the participants realizing it, as in the case of the Koljada (Latin Kalendae)—the annual visit made by the spirits of the dead, under the disguise of beggars, to all the houses in the village. It is possible that the bones of the disinterred were kept for a long period inside the dwellings, as is still sometimes done in the Tyrol of Austria, and that the sacred corner—now occupied by the icon—was the place where they were kept.

The spirits of the departed are not only venerated but also feared, especially the spirits of those who were prematurely deprived of life and its joys. It is believed that such spirits are greedy for the good things thus lost and that they make attempts to return to life—to the peril of the living. They are the prematurely dead, the so-called unclean dead. Particularly feared are maidens who died before marriage and are believed to be addicted to the kidnapping of bridegrooms and babies. One annual festival in particular, the Semik (seventh Thursday after Easter) was dedicated to the expulsion of these spirits. They are called rusalki in Russia, vile or samovile in Serbo-Croatia and Bulgaria.

The dead person who does not decompose in the grave becomes a vampire, a word and concept of Slavic origin. To save the living from a vampire’s evil deeds, it is necessary to plant a stake in the grave so that it passes through the heart of the corpse or else to exhume the corpse and burn it. Since the classes of unclean dead are believed to have been constantly increasing (in Macedonia, for example, it is believed that all those born in the three months between Christmas and Lady Day are unclean), then all of the dead—once objects of veneration and piety—will at some point be in danger of rancor, fear, and eventual disregard. A Christian clergy that has lent its presence at the exhumation and destruction of vampires has thereby contributed unwittingly to the preservation of this last phase of Slavic paganism into modern times.

There are other rites associated with second interment of which the Slavs have forgotten the purpose, such as the cemetery pyres—fires lit on top of the tombs—or the assiduous watering of graves. In Polynesia and South America where second interment is practiced, these same acts have the purpose of fostering decomposition of the corpses in order to hasten exhumation.

Numerous other ritual acts are performed by the Slavs, for the most part related to this complex of beliefs. In 19th-century Russia, if a man encountered the procession of naked women who were plowing a furrow around the village at night in order to protect it from an epidemic, he was inevitably killed. It was a chthonic (underworld) being to which, in those same times, human sacrifices were offered in Russia (more rarely in Poland and Bulgaria), since the victims were often buried alive. In most cases they were either voluntary victims or chosen by lot from among the devotees. Since such acts were punished by the law of the state, the sacrifices were performed in secrecy and are difficult to document.

Evel Gasparini

paganism, Christian term used to designate those religions that do not worship the God of Abraham, the figure central to both Christianity and to other Abrahamic religions like Judaism and Islam. Christians have used the terms paganism and pagan, which typically carry pejorative connotations, to draw clear distinctions between themselves and those who they believe are worshiping false gods.

Throughout most of the history of Christianity, few if any of those labeled pagan have adopted this label for themselves. However, since at least the first half of the 20th century, the term has been reappropriated as a self-designation by a family of related new religions. Often called modern Pagan or Neo-Pagan groups, they are inspired by the religions of Europe, North Africa, and West Asia that were rendered extinct by the spread of Christianity and the other Abrahamic traditions.

History of paganism

Christianity emerged in the Roman Empire during the first century ce. A monotheistic religion, it maintained that there was only one true God, whom it identified as the God of Abraham, a deity also venerated in Judaism. Most other traditions in the empire were polytheistic, believing in a range of gods and goddesses. For Christians these polytheistic traditions were idolatrous, devoted to deities who were in fact demons. This outlook made it difficult for many Christians to seek peaceful coexistence with these non-Abrahamic religions.

More From Britannica
celibacy: Pagan religions of the ancient Mediterranean

Surviving sources indicate that Christians were referring to those not worshiping the God of Abraham with the Latin term pagani by at least the 4th century, although it is likely that this usage had arisen earlier. In Latin usage, a paganus was an individual who lived in a rural district, or pagus, rather than in a town. The exact reasons for how this came to designate someone who was neither a Christian nor a Jew are unclear, although historians and classicists have made several proposals. One possibility is that the term pagani, meaning “people of the place,” came to denote those who maintained the worship of the traditional deities of their locality, while Christians came to be referred to as alieni, meaning “people from elsewhere.” A second possibility arises from an alternative meaning of the term paganus, that of “civilian,” which was apparent by the late 2nd or 3rd century. This alternative meaning of the term was probably coined by soldiers of the Roman army, who were often stationed in rural areas distant from Rome itself. Early Christians conceived of themselves as miles Christi, or “soldiers of Christ,” and thus may have adopted the designation of “civilian” for those who had not joined their religious movement.

Beyond Latin, there were other terms used by Christians in a largely synonymous fashion. Greek was widely spoken in eastern parts of the empire, and there the terms ethnē and ethnikoi, “foreigners,” served a similar function, being replaced largely by the term Hellēnes, “Greeks,” by the early 4th century. In translating the Gospel of Mark from Greek into Gothic during the 4th century, the Christian bishop Ulfilas (c. 311–82) developed the term haiþno as a counterpart for Hellēnis, “gentile woman.” Variants of haiþno subsequently came to be widely used in other Germanic languages, notably including the Old English hǣþen, from which derives the Modern English term heathen. An often repeated argument is that this term pertains to things being “of the heath”—it is possible that Ulfilas was deliberately evoking the sense of rurality that he believed was embodied in the Latin term pagan. The Latin term gentilis (Modern English: “gentile”) also appeared in Christian sources to characterize those who did not worship the God of Abraham, a usage distinct from the term’s currently accepted definition of “non-Jewish.”

Terms like pagan served to create a clear binary division between the Christians, who saw themselves as possessing theological truth, and all those whom they thought lived in error. Nevertheless, while the term paganism was primarily leveled against those not worshiping the God of Abraham, its use could be flexible. The term was, for instance, used amid sectarian conflict between different Christians themselves. Emerging from the Reformation of the 16th century, many Protestants accused the Roman Catholic Church of being pagan because of its veneration of saints and elaborate rituals.

The 15th to 19th centuries saw Christian Europeans expand into new areas across the Americas, Asia, Africa, and Australasia. In these lands they encountered a huge variety of religious traditions not devoted to the God of Abraham and which again they often labeled pagan or heathen. The varied traditions of the Indian subcontinent, today typically called Hinduism, were for instance labeled “Hindoo paganism” by 19th-century British writers. Across the world Christian missionary efforts were often launched to convert these non-Abrahamic peoples, with varying degrees of success.

Are you a student?
Get a special academic rate on Britannica Premium.

Changes were evident by the latter half of the 20th century. Growing concerns about Eurocentrism and racial prejudice, coupled with the promotion of ecumenism and the interfaith movement, contributed to a declining use of the terms paganism and pagan among many Christians. It has nevertheless not disappeared altogether from the Christian lexicon. These terms can still be found in use among certain Christian groups that have little desire for cordial relationships with non-Abrahamic religions.

Modern Paganisms

In Europe the idea that there was some worth to the largely polytheistic religions that Christianity had supplanted gained traction due to the influence of Renaissance humanism. Emerging in 14th-century Italy, the Renaissance humanists were in awe of the Classical societies of Greece and Rome and encouraged the incorporation of Classical deities into the artwork of the period. The positive reassessment of pre-Christian religions from elsewhere in Europe followed as a result of the Romantic movement and growing cultural nationalism during the 18th and 19th centuries. From Ireland to Russia pre-Christian mythologies were increasingly embraced in art, poetry, and literature. By the end of the 19th century, some writers were even adopting the term pagan to describe themselves and their work, or were labeled pagans or neo-pagans by their critics.

New religions venerating deities drawn from these extinct pre-Christian traditions first appeared in Europe during the opening decades of the 20th century, gaining greater visibility in the 1960s. The most popular of these was Wicca, which emerged in England before spreading to the United States. Others include Druidry, which took its identity from the Iron Age ritual specialists of Western Europe, and Heathenry, which was modeled on the pre-Christian religions of communities that spoke Germanic languages like Old Norse. Collectively, these groups came to be called Neo-Pagan or modern Pagan, a deliberate reappropriation of the Christian term. Not all of these new religions were altogether happy with this term given its pejorative origins; in Central and Eastern Europe in particular, many modern Pagan groups chose to call their traditions “Native Faith” rather than “Paganism.” These new religions eventually attracted scholarly attention, and by the 21st century a common scholarly convention was to distinguish modern Pagan groups with a capital letter, differentiating them from the Christian concept that usually lacks capitalization.

Ethan Doyle White