- Key People:
- William Bateson
- Related Topics:
- reptile
- vertebrate
- tunicate
- cephalochordate
- protochordate
Many scientists maintain that chordates originated sometime earlier than 590 million years ago; that is, they predate the fossil record. Such early representatives were soft-bodied and therefore left a poor fossil record. The oldest known fossil chordate is Pikaia gracilens, a primitive cephalochordate dated to approximately 505 million years ago. There is disagreement over whether older animals—such as Yunnanozoon lividum and Haikouella (both of which date to 530 million years ago and possess several chordate features)—should be considered chordates. An extensive vertebrate fossil record begins about 400 million years ago.
Embryological evidence places the phylum Chordata within the deuterostomes (bilaterally symmetrical animals with undeterminate cleavage and whose mouth does not arise from the blastopore), which also includes the phyla Hemichordata, Echinodermata, and Chaetognatha. The closest relatives of the chordates are probably the hemichordates, since these animals possess gill slits and other features not found in other animal phyla. A slightly more remote relationship to the echinoderms is inferred on the basis of resemblances between the larvae in some groups of hemichordates and echinoderms. The derivation of chordates from certain fossil echinoderms has been argued on the basis of features such as what appear to be gill slits. Theories that derive them from other phyla (e.g., Annelida, Nemertea, Arthropoda) have been proposed, but such theories have few contemporary advocates.
Whether the first ancestral chordate was more like a tunicate or a cephalochordate has been extensively debated. The classical theory is that the ancestor was like a cephalochordate and that one lineage became attached to hard surfaces and evolved into tunicates, whereas another remained unattached and evolved into vertebrates. An alternative theory is that the ancestor was like a tunicate and that the other two subphyla arose by modification of the tadpole larva. There is some preference for the classical theory because it provides the most satisfactory way of accounting for the similarities between chordates and hemichordates of the subphylum Enteropneusta. Within the chordates, the tunicates probably branched off before the common ancestor of cephalochordates and vertebrates arose, for the latter resemble each other in some details of neuroanatomy and biochemistry.
Classification
Annotated classification
- Phylum Chordata
- Deuterostomatous eucoelomates; gill clefts; endostyle or its derivative in pharynx; notochord; hollow dorsal nerve cord; tail posterior and dorsal to anus.
- Subphylum Tunicata (or Urochordata; tunicates)
- Notochord, when present, restricted to tail; body covered with tunic, but sometimes only cuticle; atrium, absent in Appendicularia, dorsal and often paired in embryonic development; heart present; generally sessile (attached) as adults; see below Tunicates.
- Class Ascidiacea (sea squirts)
- Sessile; benthic; solitary or colonial within a common tunic.
- Class Appendicularia (larvacea)
- Free-swimming; pelagic; resembles tadpole larvae of ascidians; 1 pair of gill slits; no distinct atrium.
- Class Thaliacea
- Pelagic; forms aggregations or colonies.
- Subphylum Cephalochordata (or Acrania; lancelets)
- Notochord extends entire body length, with tip anterior to nerve cord; atrium a single cavity with single, ventral opening; segments well developed; head poorly developed; no paired fins; no heart; see below Cephalochordates.
- Subphylum Vertebrata (or Craniata; vertebrates)
- Notochord extends to the back of a well-developed head; no atrium; segments well developed; paired fins or limbs usually present; heart present; see below Vertebrates.
Critical appraisal
This outline gives the major groups of chordates. Modern systematic biology attempts to arrange groups of organisms in a way that suggests the genealogical relationships (branching sequences) and therefore presents an epitome of evolutionary history. It also may attempt to show where there are important differences among the various groups. These goals often conflict. In a purely genealogical system, each group must correspond to a single lineage (clade) composed of the common ancestor and all of its descendants. A group that does not meet both of these requirements is called a grade and may be used as an informal group. Groups that do not contain the common ancestor, and therefore had two separate origins, are said to be polyphyletic. Such polyphyletic grades, which would put whales together with fish or birds together with bats, have generally been abandoned as soon as they were recognized. Another kind of grade, which does not include all the descendants of the common ancestor, is said to be paraphyletic and is retained in more conservative systems. Within the vertebrates the class Aves is a clade, but the class Reptilia is a grade, for the birds are modified dinosaurs. Some systems do not recognize Reptilia as a formal group. Likewise, birds, mammals, reptiles, and amphibians are all modified fish, and the old class of fishes (Pisces) is now rarely used. Vertebrata is a single clade, but “invertebrate” is a grade consisting of all animals except vertebrates. Therefore there is no formal group called Invertebrata.
Many differences among systems are quite subjective. This is often the case when a group may be ranked either as a class or as a subphylum. The organizational limits of some groups are also largely a matter of opinion. Some authors have placed the phylum Hemichordata within the Chordata, expressing the close genealogical relationship. Others prefer to keep them as a separate phylum because hemichordates lack what are considered important chordate features.
