Nuclear properties

print Print
Please select which sections you would like to print:
verifiedCite
While every effort has been made to follow citation style rules, there may be some discrepancies. Please refer to the appropriate style manual or other sources if you have any questions.
Select Citation Style
Feedback
Corrections? Updates? Omissions? Let us know if you have suggestions to improve this article (requires login).
Thank you for your feedback

Our editors will review what you’ve submitted and determine whether to revise the article.

Also known as: transuranic element
Key People:
Glenn T. Seaborg

Isotopes of the transuranium elements are radioactive in the usual ways: they decay by emitting alpha particles, beta particles, and gamma rays; and they also fission spontaneously. The table lists significant nuclear properties of certain isotopes that are useful for chemical studies. Only the principal mode of decay is given, though in many cases other modes of decay also are exhibited by the isotope. In particular, with the isotope californium-252, alpha-particle decay is important because it determines the half-life, but the expected applications of the isotope exploit its spontaneous fission decay that produces an enormous neutron output. Other isotopes, such as plutonium-238, are useful because of their relatively large thermal power output during decay (given in the table in watts per gram). Research on the chemical and solid-state properties of these elements and their compounds obviously requires that isotopes with long half-lives be used. Isotopes of plutonium and curium, for example, are particularly desirable from this point of view. In the table the specific activities (a measure of the intensity of a radioactive source) are given for those elements that can be produced in nuclear reactors. Beyond element 100 the isotopes must be produced by charged-particle reactions using particle accelerators, with the result that only relatively few atoms can be made at any one time.

Nuclear properties of selected transuranium element isotopes
name and mass principal decay mode half-life specific activity
disintegrations per minute per microgram watts per gram*
*Thermal power output.
**Indicates an approximate value.
neptunium-237 alpha 2.14(106) years 1,565 2.07(10−5)
plutonium-238 alpha 87.74 years 3.8(107) 0.570
plutonium-239 alpha 24,110 years 138,000 1.91(10−3)**
plutonium-242 alpha 375,000 years 8,730 1.13(10−4)
plutonium-244 alpha 8.00(107) years 39.1 4.93(10−7)
americium-241 alpha 432.6 years 7.6(106) 0.114
americium-243 alpha 7,370 years 44,000 6.45(10−3)
curium-242 alpha 162.8 days 7.4(109) 122
curium-244 alpha 18.1 years 1.80(108) 2.83
curium-248 alpha 348,000 years 9,400 5.32(10−4)
berkelium-249 beta (minus) 330 days 3.6(109) 0.358
californium-249 alpha 351 years 9.1(106) 0.152
californium-252 alpha 2.645 years 1.2(109) 39
einsteinium-253 alpha 20.47 days 5.6(1010) 1,000
fermium-257 alpha 100.5 days 1.1(1010) 200**
mendelevium-256 electron capture 77 minutes
mendelevium-258 alpha 51.5 days
nobelium-259 alpha 58 minutes
lawrencium-260 alpha 180 seconds
rutherfordium-261 alpha 65 seconds
dubnium-262 alpha 35 seconds
seaborgium-265 spontaneous fission 8 seconds

Nuclear structure and stability

Although the decay properties of the transuranium elements are important with regard to the potential application of the elements, these elements have been studied largely to develop a fundamental understanding of nuclear reactions and nuclear and atomic structure. Study of the known transuranium elements also helps in predicting the properties of yet-undiscovered isotopes and elements as a guide to the researcher who can then design experiments to prepare and identify them. As shown in the figure, the known isotopes can be represented graphically with the number of nuclear protons (Z) plotted along the left-hand axis and the number of neutrons (N) plotted on the top axis. The relative stabilities of the isotopes are indicated by their relative heights. In this metaphoric representation, the known isotopes resemble a peninsula rising above a sea of instability. The most stable isotopes, appearing as mountaintops, occur at specific values called magic numbers.

The magic numbers derive from calculations of the energy distribution based on the theoretical structure of the nucleus. According to theory, neutrons and protons (collectively, nucleons) are arranged within the nucleus in shells that are able to accommodate only fixed maximum numbers of them; when the shells are closed (i.e., unable to accept any more nucleons), the nucleus is much more stable than when the shells are only partially filled. The number of neutrons or protons in the closed shells yields the magic numbers. These are 2, 8, 20, 28, 50, 82, and 126. Doubly magic nuclei, such as helium-4, oxygen-16, calcium-40, calcium-48, and lead-208, which have both full proton shells and full neutron shells, are especially stable. As the proton and neutron numbers depart further and further from the magic numbers, the nuclei are relatively less stable.

As the highest atomic numbers are reached, decay by alpha-particle emission and spontaneous fission sets in (see below). At some point the peninsula of relatively stable isotopes (i.e., with an overall half-life of at least one second) is terminated. There has been, however, considerable speculation, based on a number of theoretical calculations, that an island of stability might exist in the neighbourhood of Z = 114 and N = 184, both of which are thought to be magic numbers. The longest-lasting isotope of flerovium, element 114, has N = 175 and a half-life of 2.7 seconds; this long half-life could be the “shore” of the island of stability. Isotopes in this region have significantly longer half-lives than neighbouring isotopes with fewer neutrons. There is also evidence for subshells (regions of somewhat increased stability) at Z = 108 and N = 162.

Processes of nuclear decay

The correlation and prediction of nuclear properties in the transuranium region are based on systematics (that is, extensions of observed relationships) and on the development of theoretical models of nuclear structure. The development of structural theories of the nucleus has proceeded rather rapidly, in part because valid parallels with atomic and molecular theory can be drawn.