The jet age

Air superiority

Flying at supersonic or near-supersonic speeds, often climbing into the thin air of the stratosphere, jet fighters were far less maneuverable than their propeller-driven predecessors. This made necessary a formation even more flexible than the finger-four. One solution was the fluid-four, in which two fighters flying 300 yards apart would be trailed by another pair flying 2,000 to 3,000 yards to the side, 600 yards back, and 1,000 yards above. Separation of a mile or more would allow the trailing pair to cover the lead pair from surprise attack. This tactic was favoured by the U.S. Air Force during the Vietnam War. By contrast, the U.S. Navy had developed the World War II Thach weave into the loose deuce, a more flexible formation—either pilot, depending upon the combat situation, could adopt the role of lead fighter while the other covered as wingman—and, as experience over Vietnam would show, one better suited for the jet age.

Because jet fighters had excellent climbing but poor turning ability, fighting in the vertical plane became more important than ever. The scissors maneuver acquired a vertical variation, in which two fighters would execute a series of climbing turns or barrel rolls, each with the aim of slipping behind the plane that climbed too fast. Speed—usually the greatest asset of the fighter—could easily become a liability, and many maneuvers were developed to preserve its advantage. One such maneuver was the “high-speed yo-yo,” in which an attacking fighter, in pursuing a more maneuverable opponent in a tight circle, would pull up while turning; this would reduce his speed, allowing him to remain within the circle while placing him in a position to swoop down from above.

Supersonic speed actually accounted for a tiny fraction of flying time, since igniting the jet’s afterburner could consume a fighter’s fuel in minutes. Military cruising speed was almost always subsonic, with the afterburner being used only for pursuit or escape. In fact, fuel became such a pressing concern in jet warfare that fighters often could spend no more time flying combat air patrol than they spent flying to and from the patrol area.

Suppression of air defense

Beginning in the 1960s, radar-directed antiaircraft weapons proved so dangerous that they threatened to sweep aircraft from the sky. By flying low and fast, jinking (making quick, irregular changes in direction and speed), or diving in a steep spiral, aircraft often succeeded in evading these weapons, but only at the price of spoiling the mission. Air defenses had to be destroyed; in order to do this, aircraft had not only to outfly and outgun the weapons but also to foil their guidance mechanisms with electronic countermeasures (ECM).

Britannica Quiz

World Wars

In the Vietnam War the North Vietnamese deployed a formidable air-defense system based on Soviet-made anti-aircraft guns and SA-2 surface-to-air missiles (SAMs). In response, the U.S. Navy and Air Force mounted complex air strikes employing aircraft of multiple types and capabilities. One such operation might begin with F-4 Phantom II fighter-bombers entering the target area first to drop clouds of radar-reflecting metallic fibres called chaff. These would be followed by F-105 Thunderchiefs modified into “Wild Weasels” by the addition of radar homing and warning devices designed to jam some enemy radars and locate others. The Wild Weasels would guide other F-105s armed with radar-homing missiles, which would destroy the radars and SAM sites and clear the target area for the main strike force.

That air warfare in the jet age had effectively become electronic warfare was confirmed by the Arab-Israeli War of October 1973. In the first two days of that conflict, Israel lost 40 aircraft to Egyptian and Syrian air defenses. In June 1982, however, the Israeli air force displayed a new mastery of tactics in the electronic age by destroying Syrian SAM sites in al-Biqāʿ Valley, Lebanon. The attack began with a wide array of ECM equipment—Boeing 707s modified into electronic warfare aircraft, E-2C Hawkeye early warning aircraft, and A-4 Skyhawks flying reconnaissance—to confuse and deceive Syrian communications and the radars of Syrian SA-2, SA-3, SA-6, and SA-8 SAM units. Small remotely piloted vehicles were sent over the valley; when the Syrians fired on these, Israeli F-4s spotted the SAM sites and destroyed them with radar-homing missiles and cluster bombs. Israeli F-15 Eagles and F-16 Fighting Falcons then destroyed the Syrian air force, downing more than 80 MiG-21s and MiG-23s.

The importance of destroying enemy air defenses and establishing supremacy in the air in order to assert mastery on the ground was reinforced during the Operation Desert Storm air offensive of the Persian Gulf War (1990–91). Allied air forces, led by the United States Air Force and Navy but including hundreds of French, British, Saudi, and Kuwaiti planes, had three objectives: to win air supremacy, to destroy strategic targets, and to degrade Iraqi ground forces in preparation for driving them out of occupied Kuwait. On Jan. 17, 1991, the allies launched the most intense bombing campaign in history, and by January 28 they had gained air supremacy. The Iraqi air defense system of aircraft, surface-to-air missiles, antiaircraft guns, and ground-controlled interception radars was rendered ineffective. Iraqi losses included some 35 aircraft downed in air-to-air combat, some 100 destroyed on the ground, and 115 flown to Iran to avoid destruction. Allied losses totaled only 39 aircraft, none in air combat. The allied air forces then destroyed targets vital to the Iraqi war effort. These included command, control, and communications facilities; ammunition; chemical and biological weapons facilities; petroleum, oil, and lubricant stockpiles; and manufacturing plants. Allied air forces also engaged in search-and-destroy missions against mobile launchers for Iraq’s Scud missiles. Continuing the air war in order to maximize Iraqi, and minimize allied, casualties, the allied air forces disabled some 30 percent of Iraqi ground forces in the combat zone before the launching of the Operation Desert Sabre ground assault. Operation Desert Sabre lasted only 100 hours. Large numbers of Iraqi troops surrendered without fighting, collapsing under the cumulative effects of the allies’ prolonged massive air bombardment and the concentrated firepower and speed of the ground attack.