history of Equatorial Guinea
history of Equatorial Guinea, a survey of notable events and people in the history of Equatorial Guinea, from the 15th century ce to the present day. Equatorial Guinea is located on the Atlantic coast of western Africa. The country comprises Río Muni (also known as Continental Equatorial Guinea), on the continent, and five islands (known collectively as insular Equatorial Guinea): Bioko (formerly Fernando Po), Corisco, Great Elobey (Elobey Grande), Little Elobey (Elobey Chico), and Annobón (Pagalu). Bata is the administrative capital of the mainland. Equatorial Guinea was formerly a colony of Spain, with the name Spanish Guinea; it became independent on October 12, 1968. The country’s capital is Malabo, on Bioko.
Early history of Equatorial Guinea
The island that came to be called Fernando Po (later Bioko) was sighted by the Portuguese explorer Fernão do Pó about 1472. At first it was called Formosa (“Beautiful”). Annobón was probably sighted by Ruy de Sequeira on a New Year’s Day (hence the name, which means “Good Year”) between 1472 and 1475, most likely that of 1474. By the Treaty of Tordesillas (June 7, 1494), the Portuguese had exclusive trade rights in Africa, and it was not until 1778 that they agreed to cede to Spain the islands of Annobón and Fernando Po as well as rights on the mainland coast between the Ogooué and Niger rivers. These cessions were designed to give Spain its own source of enslaved people in Africa for transport to Spanish America, where, in exchange, the Spanish confirmed the rights of the Portuguese west of the 50° W meridian in what is now Brazil. The Spanish were soon decimated by yellow fever on Fernando Po, and they withdrew in 1781. No European occupation was made on the mainland.
British administration
After the British abolition of the slave trade in 1807, bases were required by the Royal Navy for the effective suppression of the trade. Fernando Po lay in a strategic situation from which the Niger mouths and the portion of western Africa known as the Slave Coast could be watched for enslavers. In 1827 the Spanish leased bases for this purpose to the British at Port Clarence (later Santa Isabel, now Malabo), a fine deepwater harbour on the north coast, and in San Carlos Bay (now Luba Bay) on the west coast.
In the absence of the Spanish, the British also became responsible for administering the island. Thereafter the British resettled many formerly enslaved people there, in default of knowing their origin or of being able to repatriate them. Formerly enslaved people also came to the island from Sierra Leone and Jamaica, and in the 20th century the descendants of these several groups continued to speak a form of English. Because of the existence of these formerly enslaved people and the lack of any Spanish administration in the area, the United Kingdom made several unsuccessful offers to Spain for the purchase of Fernando Po, particularly from 1839 to 1841. In 1843 the Royal Navy concentrated its antislavery patrol at Freetown in Sierra Leone, and its buildings on Fernando Po were sold to a Baptist mission.
Spanish Guinea
In 1844 the Spanish made a second effort at effective occupation of Fernando Po, and their first exploration of the mainland was carried out in the two decades ending in 1877. Meanwhile, the Spanish had expelled the British Baptists from Fernando Po in 1858, and in 1879 they began to use it as a penal settlement for Cubans. Following the Spanish-American War (1898), Spanish Guinea remained as Spain’s last significant tropical colony. Profiting from the weakness of Spain, France was able to confine mainland Spanish Guinea to its present limited extent. Economic development started only at that time and was concentrated on the richer and healthier Fernando Po. The mainland received significant attention from Spain only after the Spanish Civil War (1936–39).
In 1959 the status of Spanish Guinea was changed, and the region was reorganized into two provinces of overseas Spain, each of which was placed under a civil governor. The citizens, including the Africans, were granted the same rights as those enjoyed by the citizens of Spain. In 1963 a measure of economic and administrative autonomy for the two provinces—which were henceforth known as Equatorial Guinea—was agreed on by plebiscite.
Independent Equatorial Guinea
The movement toward independence began to take shape at the end of 1967. Early the following year the Spanish government suspended autonomous political control and, with the subsequent approval of the Organization of African Unity (OAU), proposed that a national referendum be held to approve a new constitution. The constitution was overwhelmingly approved on August 11 and was followed by parliamentary elections in September and by the proclamation of independence on October 12, 1968.
The first president was Francisco Macías Nguema (also known as Macías Nguema Biyogo Masie). After his election in 1971, he assumed wide powers and pushed through a constitution that named him president for life in July 1972. He assumed absolute personal powers in 1973, and the island of Fernando Po was renamed Macias Nguema Biyogo Island in his honour. He controlled the radio and press, and foreign travel was stopped. In 1975–77 there were many arrests and summary executions, which brought protests from world leaders and the human rights organization Amnesty International. During this period there was a mass exodus by citizens of Equatorial Guinea, and by 1976 the Nigerian government had repatriated its nationals, who had been working as migrant labourers on Equatorial Guinea’s plantations.
Macías was overthrown in 1979 by his nephew, Lieut. Col. Teodoro Obiang Nguema Mbasogo, and executed. Obiang led a Supreme Military Council, to which he added some civilians in 1981. A less authoritarian constitution was instituted in 1982, followed by the election of 41 unopposed candidates to the legislature in 1983. Although a 1991 constitution provided for a multiparty state—leading to the first multiparty elections, held in 1993—there was no indication that Obiang would willingly give up power, and his regime was the subject of much international criticism for its oppressive nature. In the 1990s and early 2000s the president and the members of his party repeatedly won reelection by lopsided margins in ballots that were fraught with charges of fraud. Furthermore, accusations abounded that a clique surrounding the president had systematically pocketed the bulk of the country’s considerable oil revenue, which had grown dramatically since the late 20th century. As it had done since the 1980s, Obiang’s regime continued to claim that it had been the subject of several attempted coups, but most of the allegations could not be confirmed. A notable exception was a plot to replace Obiang with exiled opposition leader Severo Moto. Uncovered in 2004, the plan had involved foreign mercenaries. In July 2008 a Malabo court sentenced a British mercenary, Simon Mann, to 34 years in prison for his role in the affair, but Obiang pardoned him in November 2009.
In November 2011 Equatorial Guinea approved many changes to its constitution via referendum with a reported 97.7 percent of the vote. Changes included making the unicameral legislature bicameral, imposing a limit of two consecutive presidential terms, lifting the age limit for presidential candidates, and creating the position of a vice president, who would be appointed by the president and who would be next in line to assume the presidency should the incumbent president die or retire. The last two changes, as well as others, had been denounced as means of expanding Obiang’s grip on power. The vote itself was the target of criticism, including allegations of voting irregularities, intimidation, and harassment. The revised constitution was promulgated in February 2012. In May, Obiang appointed one of his sons, Teodoro (“Teodorin”) Nguema Obiang Mangue, as second vice president, a position that was not provided for under the recent changes to the constitution. Teodorin was widely viewed as Obiang’s choice for his successor. In 2014 Obiang announced that he was granting amnesty to political opponents as one of his efforts to prepare for a national dialogue with opposition parties, civil society groups, and other stakeholders that was scheduled to take place later that year. The dialogue, however, did not result in much meaningful change, and many political opponents remained in prison.
In 2015 Equatorial Guinea unexpectedly hosted the Africa Cup of Nations football (soccer) tournament. Just months before Africa’s most prestigious football tournament was to start, in January 2015, Morocco, the original host, balked at holding it as scheduled because of fears regarding an ongoing outbreak of the Ebola virus. Rather than postpone the games, the Confederation of African Football (CAF) stripped Morocco of hosting duties. Equatorial Guinea was soon named the new host and was allowed to field a team despite having been disqualified the previous year. In mere weeks the country and CAF managed to plan a tournament that typically took years of preparation, although there were some complaints of substandard facilities and transportation.
Equatorial Guinea’s 2016 presidential election was held on April 24. As in previous polls, Obiang was reelected by a huge margin—93.7 percent—though numerous human rights violations of opposition supporters were alleged to have occurred prior to the election, and there were reports of electoral fraud. Obiang attempted to hold another national dialogue in 2018, but it was dismissed as a public relations stunt by Moto, who remained a leading opposition figure, and the event was boycotted. The country did win accolades for a measure that abolished the death penalty, which Obiang signed into law in September 2022.
The country held elections on November 20, 2022, and, in the presidential poll, Obiang was reelected with 94.9 percent of the vote. As in previous elections, however, the credibility of the results was called into question, International and domestic observers reported irregularities in the electoral process and noted concerns about unfair campaign practices and instances of intimidation and coercion.
Ronald James Harrison-Church The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica