history of Zimbabwe
history of Zimbabwe, a survey of notable events and people in the history of Zimbabwe. The landlocked country is located in Southern Africa. Bantu-speaking groups have populated what is now Zimbabwe for more than 10 centuries. Those who speak Ndebele are concentrated in a circle around the city of Bulawayo, with the far greater number of Shona-speaking peoples beyond them. Generations of intermarriage have to a degree blurred the linguistic division between the Shona and Ndebele peoples.
Zimbabwe’s capital, Harare, lies in the northeastern part of the country. The city is modern and well planned, with multistoried buildings and tree-lined avenues. Harare is also a hub of rail, road, and air transport, and is the centre of Zimbabwe’s industry and commerce.
This discussion mainly focuses on the history of Zimbabwe since the late 15th century. For treatment of earlier periods and of the country in its regional context, see Southern Africa.
Brief overview of the early history of Zimbabwe
The remains of Stone Age cultures dating to 500,000 years ago have been found in Zimbabwe, and it is thought that the San, who still survive mostly in the Kalahari desert of Botswana, are the last descendants of these original inhabitants of southern and central Africa. They were driven into the desert by Bantu-speaking groups during the long migrations from the north in the course of which the Bantu-speaking peoples populated much of Africa from Lake Chad to present-day South Africa. The first Bantu are thought to have reached Zimbabwe between the 5th and 10th centuries ce. Zimbabwe is home to many stone ruins, including those known as Great Zimbabwe (designated a UNESCO World Heritage site in 1986). Some ruins date from about the 9th century, although the most elaborate belong to a period after the 15th century and are of Bantu origin.
Portuguese exploration in Zimbabwe
The Portuguese, who arrived on the east coast of Africa at the end of the 15th century, dreamed of opening up the interior and establishing a route to connect their eastern settlements with Angola in the west. The first European to enter Zimbabwe was probably António Fernandes, who tried to cross the continent and reached the neighbourhood of Que Que (now Kwekwe). Nearly 50 years later the Mwene Matapa (“emperor”), Negomo Chirisamhuru Mupunsagutu, was baptized by a Jesuit father, and in 1569 an abortive Portuguese military expedition entered the interior in search of gold.
A second great movement of the Bantu peoples began in 1830, this time from the south. To escape from the power of the great Zulu chief Shaka, three important groups fled northward. One of them, the Ndebele, carved out a kingdom. The Ndebele were warriors and pastoralists, in the Zulu tradition, and under their formidable chief Mzilikazi they mastered and dispossessed the weaker tribes, known collectively as Shona (Mashona), who were sedentary, peaceful tillers of the land. For more than half a century, until the coming of European rule, the Ndebele continued to enslave and plunder the Shona. During this period, however, British and Afrikaner hunters, traders, and prospectors had begun to move up from the south, and with them came the missionaries. Robert Moffat visited Mzilikazi in 1857, and this meeting led to the establishment in 1861 of the first mission to the Ndebele by the London Missionary Society.
The British South Africa Company
In South Africa Cecil Rhodes formed the British South Africa Company, which received its charter in October 1889. Its objects were (1) to extend the railway from Kimberley northward to the Zambezi, (2) to encourage immigration and colonization, (3) to promote trade and commerce, and (4) to secure all mineral rights, in return for guarantees of protection and security of rights to the tribal chiefs.
In 1890 a pioneer column set out from Bechuanaland and reached the site of the future capital of Rhodesia without incident on September 12. There the new arrivals settled and began to lay claim to prospecting rights. The Ndebele resented this European invasion, and in 1893 they took up arms, being defeated only after months of strenuous fighting. Lobengula, Mzilikazi’s son and successor, fled, and the company assumed administrative control of Matabeleland. In 1895 many of the pioneers were persuaded to take part in the Jameson Raid into the Transvaal and were captured and sent to England for trial. In the same year, the company-administered territories, which had previously been loosely known as Zambesia, were formally named Rhodesia by proclamation. In 1896 the Ndebele rose again. Returning from London, Rhodes met with the Ndebele chiefs and persuaded them to make peace. The Shona had at first accepted the Europeans, but they too became rebellious, and the whole country was not pacified until 1897.
Economic and political development
By 1892 about 1,500 settlers from the south had arrived in Rhodesia. The railway reached Bulawayo in 1896 and Victoria Falls in 1904. By the following year there were 12,500 settlers in the country, and in 1909 gold exports were worth more than £2,500,000. Agricultural development, however, was slower, and it was not until 1907 that steps were taken to facilitate the acquisition of land. By 1911 nearly £35,000 worth of tobacco was being exported annually, and the European population had risen to 23,600.
From the earliest years, the settlers had demanded representation on the Legislative Council, which in 1903 comprised seven company officials and seven elected representatives of the settlers. In 1907 the settlers were given a majority of seats. In 1914, when the 25-year term of the company’s charter was due to expire, the settlers, faced with the alternative of joining the Union of South Africa, asked for the continuation of the charter pending the grant of self-government. The British government therefore extended the charter for 10 years, with the proviso that self-government could be granted earlier if the settlers showed themselves capable of administering the country unaided.
Self-government
Immediately after World War I (1914–18) the pressure for self-government was resumed, and a royal commission was appointed to consider the future of the territory. As a result of the commission’s report, a referendum of the electors among the 34,000 Europeans in the country was held in 1922; the choice was between entry into the Union of South Africa as its fifth province and full internal self-government. In spite of the offer of generous terms by the Union’s prime minister, General Jan C. Smuts, a majority voted for self-government. On September 12, 1923, Southern Rhodesia was annexed to the crown and became a self-governing colony. The British government retained control of external affairs and a final veto in respect to legislation directly affecting Africans.
The interwar period was one of material progress, with the development of a reasonably prosperous economy based on copper, gold, and other minerals, corn (maize), tobacco, and cattle. By 1953 Southern Rhodesia had a European population of 157,000 and an annual revenue of more than £28 million.
The policy of Sir Godfrey Huggins (later Lord Malvern), who served as prime minister of Southern Rhodesia for 20 years, was to build a society in accord with Rhodes’s dictum of “equal rights for all civilized men,” one in which merit and not colour should be the test of political and economic advancement. He believed that political power should not be given to the Africans until they were sufficiently experienced to know how to exercise it in cooperation with the Europeans and thus to maintain the economic development built up over the years.
A second principle in which Lord Malvern and most other Europeans in Southern Rhodesia and Northern Rhodesia (later Zambia) profoundly believed was that the two countries should be joined together, both for their mutual economic benefit and to ensure the establishment of a powerful state based on British culture and traditions. Malvern failed to secure their amalgamation, but he supported the federation of Southern Rhodesia, Northern Rhodesia, and Nyasaland (later Malawi) when that solution was eventually accepted by the British in 1953, giving birth to the Federation of Rhodesia and Nyasaland.
Federation
In 1957 a new electoral law was passed providing for a common roll of voters (the “A” roll, composed only of whites) with a special roll for those with lower qualifications (the “B” roll, a tiny minority of the Black population). At the same time, there was growing political consciousness among the Africans, together with increasing hostility to the idea of federation. Joshua Nkomo was one of the fiercest opponents of federation as the local leader of the African National Congress, and, when that organization was banned, he became president of the National Democratic Party in 1960. It, too, was soon banned, and he formed the Zimbabwe African People’s Union (ZAPU), which in turn was banned in 1962. In 1963 Robert Mugabe broke with ZAPU to join the Zimbabwe African National Union (ZANU) and thereby split African support along ethnic lines—Nkomo retained the Ndebele ethnic minority (mostly in the Matabeleland region), while Mugabe garnered the Shona ethnic majority.
In June 1962 the United Nations General Assembly called for a more liberal constitution for the territory. The election of December 1962, during which the 1961 constitution came into force, was boycotted by the African nationalists. The ruling United Federal Party was defeated by the more conservative Rhodesian Front (RF), and Winston Field became prime minister. At the end of 1963 the federation was dissolved, and Southern Rhodesia reverted to its former status as a colony.
Kenneth Bradley Kenneth InghamRhodesia and the UDI
The goal of the RF was Rhodesian independence under guaranteed minority rule. Field was replaced as prime minister in April 1964 by his deputy, Ian Smith. The RF swept all A-roll seats in the 1965 election, and Smith used this parliamentary strength to tighten controls on the political opposition. After several attempts to persuade Britain to grant independence, Smith’s government announced the Unilateral Declaration of Independence (UDI) on November 11, 1965.
Britain declined to respond to the UDI with force, instead attempting economic tactics such as ending the link between sterling and the Rhodesian currency and seizing assets. Smith’s government countered by defaulting on its (British-guaranteed) debts, leaving the British liable while at the same time balancing its budget. The United Nations Security Council imposed mandatory economic sanctions on Rhodesia in 1966, the first time that the UN had taken that action against a state. The sanctions were broadened in 1968 but still were only partly successful; some strategic minerals, especially chromium, were exported to willing buyers in Europe and North America, further strengthening the economy.
On June 20, 1969, a referendum was held in Rhodesia regarding adoption of a constitution that would enshrine political power in the hands of the white minority and establish Rhodesia as a republic; Rhodesia’s predominantly white electorate overwhelmingly approved both measures. The constitution was approved by Parliament in November, and on March 2, 1970, Rhodesia declared itself a republic.
Unsuccessful negotiations with Britain continued. A 1971 proposal to lessen restrictions on the opposition led to the creation of a third nationalist movement, the United African National Council (UANC), led by the Methodist bishop Abel Muzorewa. Unlike ZAPU and ZANU—both banned and operating only from exile in Zambia and Mozambique, respectively—UANC was able to organize inside Rhodesia and held talks with the government during the 1970s. In the early 1970s ZAPU and ZANU had sporadically organized raids into Rhodesia, but in December 1972 the violence of the conflict intensified after a ZANU attack in the northeast. The Zambia-Rhodesia border was closed in 1973, but Mozambican independence in 1975 provided a valuable base of operations for ZANU, which had close links to the Frelimo government.
The white Rhodesian government was thus under diplomatic, military, and, increasingly, economic pressure for a settlement. The 1976 rapprochement between Nkomo and Mugabe led to the formation of the Patriotic Front (PF), which received frontline support from Rhodesia’s majority-ruled neighbours. The fighting escalated in both area and intensity, and the emergency measures adopted by the government to counter it also served to increase antigovernment feeling. By 1979 the combination of pressures had forced Smith to accept the necessity of an “internal settlement.”
Independent Zimbabwe
A new government
A 1978 agreement with internal Black leaders, including Muzorewa, had promised elections for a transitional government that would provide for both enfranchisement of Blacks and protection of white political and economic interests. The UANC won a clear majority of the seats allotted to Black representatives in the April 1979 election, and the country adopted the name Zimbabwe. Without PF participation or support for Muzorewa’s new government, however, Zimbabwe was unable to end the warfare. Diplomatic recognition of the new government was not forthcoming given the stalemate; after talks between Muzorewa, Mugabe, and Nkomo at the Lancaster House conference in London in late 1979, Britain briefly retook control of Southern Rhodesia as a colony until a new round of elections was held in February 1980. Of the 80 contested Black seats, ZANU (now using the name ZANU-PF) won 57, ZAPU 20, and the UANC 3. Mugabe became the first prime minister as Zimbabwe achieved an internationally recognized independence on April 18, 1980.
(Mugabe wrote an article for the 1982 Britannica Book of the Year [events of 1981] detailing the Black majority’s struggle for independence. See Struggling for Nationhood: The Birth of Zimbabwe.)
Mugabe’s new government moved deliberately to redress inequalities of race and class, redistribute land held by the white minority, and promote economic development, with a one-party socialist state as its long-term goal. During the 1980s, drought and white emigration badly damaged the economy, which was already strained by the need for massive government spending in the long-neglected areas of education, health, and social services for the Black majority. In 1982 Mugabe charged that Nkomo was plotting a coup and dismissed him from his cabinet, while arresting other leaders of ZAPU. Nkomo’s supporters in the Matabeleland region retaliated, precipitating a civil war. Fighting did not cease until Mugabe and Nkomo reached an agreement in December 1987 whereby ZAPU was subsumed into ZANU-PF, Mugabe became the country’s first executive president, and Nkomo became one of the nation’s two vice presidents. Mugabe was reelected in 1990, 1996, and 2002.
The economy continued to lag throughout the 1990s as inflation soared, and a high level of unemployment led to significant unrest. In 1998 Mugabe’s intervention in the civil war in the Democratic Republic of the Congo—purportedly to protect his personal investments—resulted in suspension of international economic aid for Zimbabwe. This suspension of aid and the millions of dollars spent to intervene in the war further weakened Zimbabwe’s already troubled economy.
The issue of land reform and the rise of the Movement for Democratic Change
Throughout the 1980s and ’90s the government continued to struggle with the issue of land reform. Some 4,000 white farmers collectively controlled about one-third of Zimbabwe’s arable land, and hundreds of white-owned farms were either officially redistributed by the government or partially taken over by squatters responding to government promises and the lack of police deterrence. Nevertheless, public support for the farmers and opposition to Mugabe’s increasingly autocratic rule were evidenced by the defeat of a referendum in February 2000 calling for a new constitution that would have extended Mugabe’s rule for two more six-year terms and given him the power to confiscate white-owned farms without compensation, as well as by the June elections, in which the opposition party Movement for Democratic Change (MDC), led by Morgan Tsvangirai, won almost half of the parliamentary seats.
Despite the apparent reprieve for white owners, a law was passed in 2002 that allowed Mugabe to pursue an aggressive program of confiscating their farms, forcing more than half of the country’s white farmers to relinquish their property and rendering tens of thousands of Black farmworkers homeless and unemployed. As was the case in the 1990s, property was often claimed by politically connected individuals with little or no farming experience rather than by the landless peasant farmers or war veterans who were supposed to benefit from the redistribution program. The government’s lack of forethought in forcing out the white farmers and not replacing them with experienced farmworkers contributed to a significant decline in agricultural productivity; this, as well as drought, led to severe food shortages.
Increasing discord
At the beginning of the 21st century, with Mugabe’s popularity well in decline, his regime became increasingly brutal and repressive. Media freedom was curtailed by restrictive laws, and several newspapers were shut down by the government. The MDC and others critical of the government were dealt with harshly. Mugabe’s reelection victory over Tsvangirai in 2002 was tainted by violence and criticized by observers, leading the Commonwealth to suspend Zimbabwe for one year. After the Commonwealth decided to extend the suspension indefinitely, Zimbabwe withdrew from the organization in December 2003. The 2005 parliamentary election was clouded by accusations of irregularities and was not deemed free or fair by the opposition and most observers, though the Southern African Development Community (SADC)—the only foreign observers officially accredited by the Zimbabwean government to observe proceedings—determined that the election met the will of the people. Shortly after the parliamentary election, the government launched “Operation Murambatsvina,” a cleanup campaign that destroyed thousands of homes and stores in shantytowns on the outskirts of Harare and other urban centres. More than half a million people were displaced, and critics of the government claimed that this was a punitive measure aimed at the supporters of the opposition, who were mainly located in the shantytowns.
The MDC began to experience internal dissent in late 2005 as some members became disenchanted with Tsvangirai’s leadership, especially his decision to boycott elections for the newly reinstated Senate, and a faction of the MDC, led by Arthur Mutambara, a former student protest leader, professor, and consultant, broke away. Harassment of the opposition continued, and in March 2007 Tsvangirai and several other members of the MDC were viciously beaten; the Mugabe administration drew international criticism after images of the injured circulated throughout the world. Increasing pressure to resolve the conflict between the MDC and ZANU-PF led to mediation efforts by the SADC, facilitated by South African president Thabo Mbeki, but talks broke off in early 2008 without reaching a resolution.
Economic crisis
Meanwhile, economic troubles continued as sanctions were imposed on Zimbabwe and loans and economic aid from many donors, including the International Monetary Fund, were limited or completely withdrawn for various reasons, most notably in protest of the government’s land-seizure program and because the country had fallen behind on repayments of previous loans. Inflation was rampant: the official government estimate reached nearly 8,000 percent in September 2007 (other, nongovernment estimates were up to several times that figure) before the government’s Central Statistic Office stated that they were unable to continue calculating inflation rates, because of a lack of data; the basic consumer goods needed for the calculations could no longer be found in shops throughout the country. In early 2008, after government calculations had resumed, the official estimate had risen to more than 100,000 percent; by the end of the summer, it had surpassed 10 million percent. Economic problems also included an extremely high rate of unemployment, estimated at some four-fifths of the population and among the highest in the world. Employment did not guarantee financial security though, as the wages earned by those who were employed were unable to keep pace with inflation. Many Zimbabweans left the country—often going to South Africa—to find work; many of those who remained relied on relatives abroad to send remittances.
In the midst of the country’s worsening economic situation was the debate on the root causes of it. Some—primarily supporters of the government—blamed what they deemed to be unfair economic sanctions, the failure of the British government to honour the terms of the 1979 Lancaster House agreement regarding the transfer of land to Black ownership, and a Western plot to oust Mugabe from power. Others, especially critics of the government, blamed the land-seizure program and the economic mismanagement under the Mugabe administration. Both groups acknowledged that corruption also played a role. Regardless of the reasons for the economic troubles, many Zimbabweans were adversely affected, lacking basic commodities and suffering from food insecurity, fuel shortages, record-high rates of unemployment, and hyperinflation.
2008 elections and aftermath
Through all of Zimbabwe’s political and economic troubles, Mugabe retained the support of many African heads of state and remained popular within ZANU-PF. In December 2007 the party endorsed Mugabe as its presidential candidate in the 2008 elections. However, as the country continued its downward spiral in the months leading up to the elections, support for Mugabe appeared to waver: former finance minister and ZANU-PF stalwart Simba Makoni announced that he was running against Mugabe for the presidency, and the MDC, with Tsvangirai as its presidential candidate once again, saw its popularity increase throughout the country, even in areas that were typically ZANU-PF strongholds. As the elections drew near, both opposition candidates and their followers were subject to harassment and attacks by the police and ZANU-PF loyalists.
Presidential, parliamentary, and local elections were held on March 29, 2008. Unofficial preliminary results indicated a favourable outcome for Tsvangirai and the MDC, but, as days passed with only a slow, partial release of parliamentary results (and the complete absence of presidential results), many feared that Mugabe and ZANU-PF were manipulating the outcome of the elections in their favour. The MDC released its own accounting of the presidential election results on April 2, which indicated that Tsvangirai had captured slightly more than half the votes; the MDC’s claims were dismissed by ZANU-PF, and the country continued to wait for official results. Later that day, results indicated that Tsvangirai’s faction of the MDC had won the most seats in the House of Assembly. Senate results announced several days later revealed a split between the MDC and ZANU-PF, with the latter receiving an only slightly larger share of the votes. The final results for the presidential contest were not officially released until May 2, when it was announced that Tsvangirai had garnered more votes (47.9 percent) than Mugabe (43.2 percent), but, since Tsvangirai had not secured a majority of the votes, a runoff election would be necessary, which was later scheduled for June 27.
In the weeks leading up to the runoff election, MDC supporters were harassed and victimized by violent attacks, which the MDC asserted were sponsored by the ZANU-PF-led government; the government in turn claimed that the MDC was responsible for the violence. An increasingly tense climate was further heightened by several government actions, including the detention of Mutambara, Tsvangirai, and several other MDC officials and supporters, as well as several diplomats from the United Kingdom and the United States who were in the midst of investigating reports of preelection violence, the suspension of all humanitarian aid operations in the country, and statements from Mugabe implying that he would not cede power to the opposition if he lost the runoff election. As the politically motivated violence, intimidation, and rhetoric continued, on June 22 Tsvangirai announced that he was withdrawing from the election, citing the impossibility of it being free and fair in the country’s current political climate. Nevertheless, the election was still held, and Mugabe was declared the winner despite assertions from independent observers that the election was neither free nor fair.
The fact that the election was even held—as well as the outcome—prompted widespread international condemnation, most notably from some of the governments of African countries that had previously supported Mugabe, and there were calls for the MDC and ZANU-PF to form a power-sharing government. To that end, SADC-led talks, again facilitated by Mbeki, were held with ZANU-PF and the two factions of the MDC. Although the parties were able to reach a consensus regarding the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to direct the terms and scope of the discussion, an agreement regarding a new power-sharing government did not progress as quickly. Meanwhile, Mugabe announced that he intended to convene parliament on August 26, 2008. This announcement was met with protest from the MDC and others who complained that doing so before a power-sharing agreement was reached contradicted the terms of the MOU. Nonetheless, parliament was convened per Mugabe’s directive. Notably, however, the House of Assembly speaker was elected from Tsvangirai’s faction of the MDC—the first time since the country’s independence in 1980 that the speaker position was held by an opposition party member.
SADC-led negotiations for a power-sharing government continued, and on September 15, 2008, Mugabe, Mutambara, and Tsvangirai signed a comprehensive power-sharing agreement—referred to as the Global Political Agreement (GPA). As part of the agreement, Mugabe would remain president but would cede some power to Tsvangirai, who would serve as prime minister; Mutambara would serve as a deputy prime minister. Initial jubilation quickly turned to disappointment in the following months when it became clear that Mugabe and Tsvangirai could not come to terms on how to implement the agreement, arguing over how to allocate the new government’s key ministries between ZANU-PF and the MDC. Stalled talks and repeated attempts by the SADC to get discussions back on track continued against a backdrop of worsening economic and humanitarian conditions in the country. Rampant inflation continued, with official estimates at more than 200 million percent (unofficial estimates were much higher), and there were severe food shortages. The country’s municipal and health services, lacking the funds and supplies to function adequately, rapidly deteriorated, and this fueled a deadly cholera epidemic. Dozens of MDC supporters, human rights activists, and reporters had disappeared; the MDC alleged that they had been abducted by ZANU-PF- and government-allied forces. International support for continued negotiations for the power-sharing government began to wane, with some critics calling for Mugabe to step down from power; he adamantly refused to do so and later announced his intention to form a government on his own if Tsvangirai and the MDC would not participate. In late January 2009 Tsvangirai—under pressure from the SADC—agreed to join Mugabe in a new government, despite lingering misgivings. On February 5, 2009, Zimbabwe’s legislature passed the necessary constitutional amendment that altered the structure of the executive branch, allowing for the creation of the prime minister and deputy prime minister posts. On February 11, 2009, Tsvangirai was sworn in as prime minister, and Thokozani Khupe, of Tsvangirai’s faction of the MDC, and Mutambara were sworn in as deputy prime ministers.
The new government soon made efforts to improve the country’s poor economic situation. In April 2009 it suspended the Zimbabwean dollar and allowed various foreign currencies, notably the South African rand and the U.S. dollar, to be used instead, which served to help halt inflation and foster economic stability. Restructuring programs were introduced in the agricultural and mining sectors, and these programs as well as an improvement in global prices for some of Zimbabwe’s exports contributed to economic growth in the following years.
The economic achievements notwithstanding, the unity government was a troubled one: the MDC factions and ZANU-PF struggled to agree on many issues, and Tsvangirai denounced ongoing human rights violations. Under the terms of the 2008 GPA, a new constitution was initially expected to have been drafted and put to referendum by 2011. However, the drafting process was fraught with difficulties and hindered by disagreements between ZANU-PF and the MDC factions, and the draft constitution was not completed until early 2013. Endorsed by both Tsvangirai’s faction of the MDC and ZANU-PF, it provided for many changes, including the devolution of power, the introduction of presidential term limits, and the termination of the prime minister post; it also barred any further legal challenges concerning farms previously seized under the government’s land reform program. In a referendum held on March 16, 2013, the draft constitution was overwhelmingly approved by voters, and in May that year it was approved by both houses of parliament and signed into law by Mugabe.
2013 elections and a new government
In May 2013 the Constitutional Court ordered that the upcoming presidential and parliamentary polls were to be held by the end of July. In response, Mugabe called for the elections to be held on July 31, 2013, initially ignoring complaints from Tsvangirai and others that it was too soon for the polls to be held, because necessary democratic reforms had not yet been enacted and because the country would have trouble organizing and funding the polls on such short notice. Once he was faced with additional pressure from regional leaders, however, Mugabe sought to delay the elections, but his request was denied by the Constitutional Court. Although election day was relatively peaceful, there were complaints regarding the electoral roll, which was not made public until the day before the election and appeared to contain many inaccuracies. Additionally, many voters—particularly in urban areas, which were typically MDC strongholds—were not allowed to vote. Mugabe was declared the winner, having captured some 61 percent of the vote to about 34 percent for Tsvangirai, who announced that the MDC totally rejected the results of the election, which he characterized as “fraudulent and stolen.” The results also showed that ZANU-PF took the majority of the directly elected seats in the lower house of parliament, the National Assembly, winning 158 seats, while Tsvangirai’s faction of the MDC took 49 seats, far fewer than it had won in 2008. In the Senate, ZANU-PF won 37 of the body’s 60 directly elected seats, and Tsvangirai’s faction of the MDC won 21.
The two main international observer groups monitoring the elections were the African Union (AU) and the SADC. They and another monitoring organization—the Zimbabwe Elections Support Network (ZESN), a domestic group that had amassed by far the largest number of observers throughout the country—were somewhat at odds with their assessments of the electoral process. The AU and the SADC praised the elections as being free and peaceful, but the SADC held off on calling the process “fair” until it had time to complete its investigation. The latter organization’s final report, released in September, declared that the election was generally credible but did not label it as being “fair.” The ZESN cited numerous problems with the electoral process that it deemed to be serious but agreed that the process had been peaceful. There were, however, allegations of isolated postelection violence.
Tsvangirai and the MDC filed a petition with the Constitutional Court to overturn the election results and hold a new election. They later tried to withdraw the petition, however, believing that they would not receive a fair hearing after another court did not grant their requests to obtain election data that they needed as evidence. The Constitutional Court refused to dismiss the petition and ruled that Mugabe was the legitimate winner of the election. The 89-year-old Mugabe was inaugurated amid much fanfare on August 22, 2013.
Zimbabwe’s economy, which had began to recover and show growth in the years under the unity government, had started to deteriorate in 2014 in part because of drought, weak export performance, and too much money being spent on the public servant wage bill and debt servicing. A shortage of cash led to the introduction of bond notes in 2016. Discontent with the struggling economy and the government led to an unprecedented level of public demonstrations against Mugabe’s administration beginning in 2016.
Succession
The question of who would succeed the aging president loomed large as he grew older and the state of his health appeared to decline. One potential successor was Joice Mujuru, one of Zimbabwe’s two vice presidents and a ZANU-PF stalwart who was celebrated for her role in the guerrilla war against Smith’s white-minority government. After decades of service in various government roles, she had become an influential member of ZANU-PF and was well positioned to succeed Mugabe. In 2014, however, Mugabe’s wife, Grace, began a series of verbal assaults on Mujuru’s reputation, impugning her war record and accusing her of being involved in corrupt activities. After months of such attacks, Mujuru was fired from her vice president post in December 2014; she was expelled from the party in April 2015. Many other party members allied with her were purged from their ministerial posts as well. In 2016 she formed a new political party, Zimbabwe People First, with some of the other ousted ZANU-PF members. After disagreements with other leaders of the new party, however, she left and founded the National People’s Party (NPP) in 2017. As an opposition leader, she flirted with forming a coalition with Tsvangirai’s MDC (MDC-T) and other opposition parties to challenge Mugabe and ZANU-PF in the 2018 elections. After Mujuru’s ouster from ZANU-PF, the most notable potential successors to Mugabe from within his party were Emmerson Mnangagwa—another party stalwart and decorated war hero, who had replaced Mujuru as one of Zimbabwe’s two vice presidents—and, unexpectedly, Mugabe’s wife, Grace.
Although Grace Mugabe had generally kept a low profile in political matters during most of her husband’s presidency, in 2014 she rapidly became a significant player on the political stage. That year, she made appearances at many political rallies throughout the country, during which she gave fiery speeches defending her husband and harshly criticizing those whom she deemed a threat, primarily Mujuru. In December 2014 Grace Mugabe was named head of ZANU-PF’s Women’s League, despite not meeting the qualifications regarding having an active history with the group. Being named head of the league also made her a member of ZANU-PF’s powerful politburo. Prior to that, her rising profile had been further bolstered in September, when she was awarded a Ph.D. in sociology by the University of Zimbabwe, reportedly just mere months after beginning her studies.
At ZANU-PF’s annual conferences, Robert Mugabe continued to be endorsed as the party’s presidential candidate in the 2018 election, even though he would be 94 by then. The party remained steadfast in its avoidance of any official discussions regarding who would succeed him after he died.
The issue of succession was in the fore again in 2017, when Mnangagwa was subjected to verbal attacks from Grace Mugabe, similar to what Mujuru had experienced in 2014. Later, Robert Mugabe also publicly chastised Mnangagwa, threatening to fire him. Mugabe soon followed up on his threat: Mnangagwa was dismissed from the vice presidency on November 6, 2017, and his top-level supporters within ZANU-PF were also targeted for expulsion from the party. With Mnangagwa’s removal, Grace Mugabe looked to be secure as the sole contender to succeed her husband, and it was rumoured that she would be appointed as vice president of the country at a party congress in December, further bolstering her power. The military, however, appeared tired of the succession maneuvers in ZANU-PF, which appeared to favour the younger generation of party members who supported Grace Mugabe at the expense of respected liberation war veterans aligned with the military. A week after Mnangagwa was sacked, the chief of Zimbabwe’s army, Gen. Constantino Chiwenga, issued a stern warning regarding the removal of liberation war veterans from positions of power, threatening to intervene if such actions did not stop.
The military followed up on that threat when, in the early morning hours of November 15, 2017, it seized power, placed Robert Mugabe under house arrest, and began arresting members of his cabinet and high-level supporters of his wife. Claiming that it was not a coup, a military spokesperson said that Mugabe was still the president and commander in chief and that the safety of Mugabe and his family was guaranteed. The spokesperson also said that the military was just targeting the “criminals” who surrounded Mugabe and were responsible for poor social and economic conditions in the country. The military pledged that the political situation would return to normal once they were brought to justice.
In the days that followed, it became clear that Mugabe had little support left. Zimbabweans demonstrated peacefully in Harare and in other cities across the country, calling for him to resign, and ZANU-PF moved to reduce Mugabe’s role in the party and government. The party’s central committee met on November 19. It voted to remove Mugabe from his position as party leader and named Mnangagwa to take his place. Grace Mugabe was sacked from her position as head of ZANU-PF’s Women’s League and was expelled from the party; several of her supporters were expelled as well. The party also called for Robert Mugabe to resign by noon on November 20—stating that if he did not, it would initiate impeachment proceedings—and voted for Mnangagwa to be the party’s nominee to serve out the rest of Mugabe’s term as president of Zimbabwe after the latter’s resignation or impeachment. After Mugabe did not resign by the party’s deadline, ZANU-PF did indeed introduce motions of impeachment in the parliament on November 21. Impeachment charges included allegations that Mugabe was no longer fit to serve as president and that he had permitted his wife to usurp power. Shortly after the proceedings began that day, however, Mugabe sent to the parliament a letter proclaiming his resignation, effective immediately.
The following day, Mnangagwa returned to Zimbabwe. He was inaugurated as interim president of the country on November 24, 2017. Mnangagwa pledged to restore Zimbabwe’s devastated economy and promised that the elections, scheduled to be held in 2018, would proceed as planned and would be free and fair.
Mnangagwa stated his desire to reintegrate Zimbabwe into the global economic and diplomatic communities. To that end, he declared that the country was “open for business,” stating that economic policies that had deterred foreign investment in the country were being revised. The new government made overtures to the country’s remaining white farmers, such as granting them the security of 99-year leases on farmland (as compared with the five-year leases available under Mugabe) in an effort to rebuild the agricultural sector. Mnangagwa’s administration also pledged to address Zimbabwe’s debts to international lenders such as the World Bank. In May 2018 Mnangagwa applied for readmission of Zimbabwe into the Commonwealth; as part of the readmission process, he invited the organization to send observers to the country’s upcoming elections.
Meanwhile, Zimbabwe’s main opposition party, the MDC-T, suffered a blow when Tsvangirai died in February 2018 after an extended battle with cancer. His illness and death launched a bitter struggle for control of the MDC-T party, with Nelson Chamisa and Thokozani Khupe—two of the party’s three deputy presidents—splitting the party into two factions. The internecine squabbles led to fears that the opposition would not be strong enough to successfully challenge ZANU-PF in the upcoming elections.
2018 elections
The country’s presidential, parliamentary, and local elections were held on July 30, 2018. For the first time in 16 years, observers from the United States and the European Union (EU) were allowed to monitor the proceedings; observers from the Commonwealth as well as regional bodies were there as well. Although 23 candidates contested the presidential poll, it was widely held that the real contest would be between the top two candidates, Mnangagwa and Chamisa. If no one candidate received more than 50 percent of the vote, a runoff election between the top two vote getters would be held in September. Results for the National Assembly elections, released in a timely manner, indicated that ZANU-PF had won more than a two-thirds majority in the body, taking 145 of the 210 seats; the MDC Alliance (Chamisa’s MDC-T faction and other parties) won 63 seats.
A slight delay in the release of the results of the presidential election had the country on tenterhooks and brought accusations by the opposition of electoral malfeasance by the ZANU-PF-led government. When the presidential results were released, beginning late in the day on August 2, Mnangagwa was declared the winner, taking 50.8 percent of the vote to Chamisa’s 44.3 percent. Since Mnangagwa won more than 50 percent of the vote—albeit just barely—a runoff election was not needed, and he was declared the winner. Chamisa and the MDC Alliance rejected the results and challenged them in the country’s Constitutional Court. During the case hearing, the electoral commission revealed that there had been an error in the original results, although it wasn’t enough to change the outcome of the election. Mnangagwa’s and Chamisa’s totals were revised to 50.6 percent and 44.39 percent, respectively. The Constitutional Court ultimately upheld Mnangagwa’s victory, and he was inaugurated on August 26, 2018.
2023 elections
The 2023 general election took place on August 23, 2023, with voting extended by an additional day in some areas due to logistical problems. In the presidential race there were 11 candidates, with President Mnangagwa and Chamisa once again widely viewed as the front-runners. This time, however, Chamisa was the flag bearer for the Citizens Coalition for Change (CCC), a new party he had formed. The campaign period was tense, with complaints about biased media coverage in favour of Mnangagwa and ZANU-PF and reports that state security forces were unfairly targeting opposition rallies by dispersing ongoing rallies or preventing them from being held. The CCC and others complained that the Zimbabwe Electoral Commission (ZEC) did not provide, as required by law, updated voter rolls and polling station locations for review. On election day there were several problems. Ballots arrived several hours late in some polling locations, particularly in urban areas, which tended to be opposition strongholds. Even though voting was extended by a day, many people had to wait in line for hours, even overnight, for a chance to vote; those who were not able to wait that long were unable to vote at all. In rural areas, a secretive new group called the Forever Associates Zimbabwe (FAZ) was reported to have intimidated voters. Dozens of election monitors were arrested by the Zimbabwe police. The election was criticized by international observer groups, including those of the EU, the Commonwealth, and—most notably—the SADC and AU, which typically did not publicly question the legitimacy of a Zimbabwean election.
Amid the backdrop of the troubling election concerns, the ZEC declared Mnangagwa the winner, saying that he took almost 53 percent of the vote; his nearest challenger, as expected, was Chamisa, with 44 percent. The CCC rejected the results and called for the election to be rerun, to no avail. Mnangagwa was sworn in for his second term on September 4, 2023.
Meanwhile, in the legislative elections results showed that ZANU-PF had maintained a majority in the National Assembly, taking almost two-thirds of the seats, with the CCC garnering the remainder. In the Senate the seats were more evenly divided, with ZANU-PF taking slightly more than half of the directly elected seats and the CCC claiming the rest.